<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
- To: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mansourkia, Magnolia \(Maggie\)" <maggie.mansourkia@xxxxxxx>, "David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>, <KathrynKL@xxxxxxx>, <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
- From: "Paul Stahura" <stahura@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:41:45 -0800
I'm saying that if you do a bunch of lookups based on complaints about
Internet abuse you will see disproportionately more "bad" whois inputted
from bad actors than "bad" whois inputted from people with privacy
concerns.
Obviously if you do a "repeated sampling of complaint stats and data"
from that then the "overwhelming bears this out" part will be erroneous,
hence "bull".
________________________________
From: Anthony Harris [mailto:harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 6:25 AM
To: Paul Stahura; Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie); David W. Maher;
KathrynKL@xxxxxxx; kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
Paul,
I'm rather slow today (yesterday was a national holiday here), would
you be so kind as to clarify this comment of yours? I am unable to
understand it, and obviously assume the word 'bull' is not intended
to define a liar?
Tony Harris
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Stahura <mailto:stahura@xxxxxxxx>
To: Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie)
<mailto:maggie.mansourkia@xxxxxxx> ; David W. Maher
<mailto:dmaher@xxxxxxx> ; KathrynKL@xxxxxxx ; kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx ;
gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 10:32 PM
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
Bull.
You/they see more "bad actors" with false whois probably because
you/they are doing disproportionately more whois lookups for names that
bad actors registered.
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mansourkia, Magnolia
(Maggie)
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 1:45 PM
To: David W. Maher; KathrynKL@xxxxxxx; kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
Yes--common sense! More seriously, ISPs' have some of the
largest Internet abuse and complaint departments around and our repeated
sampling of complaint stats and data overwhelming bears this out.
-----Original Message-----
From: David W. Maher [mailto:dmaher@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 3:16 PM
To: Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie); KathrynKL@xxxxxxx;
kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
Do you have any factual basis for this assertion?
David Maher
At 11:24 AM 12/8/2005, Mansourkia, Magnolia (Maggie) wrote:
There are far more bad actors registering domains than there are
those falsifying information as a privacy concern.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|