ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dow123]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm

  • To: "Bret Fausett" <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm
  • From: "Anthony Harris" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 15:54:56 -0300

Bret,

If these percentages are correct, then in the case of gTLD
registrations, and if we take a number of 35 million gTLD
registrations as a ball park figure (I am probably a little off
mark), that would mean 5.14% would be equivalent to
1.799.000 registrations with 'patently false data in at least
one of the required whois fields' ?

As a percentage granted it may not be significant; as an array of potential law infringement and abuse perpetrators, the
number might raise some concern?


Tony Harris

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bret Fausett" <bfausett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Emailing: 2100-9588_22-5986553.htm



I think it's also worth noting that according to the GAO report, only 5.14% of gTLD registrations have patently false data in at least one of the required whois fields and only 3.64% of registrations have incomplete data in at least one of the required whois fields. The press seems to be reporting this as "rampant" false data, but quite frankly I was stunned by how low those numbers are. I would have expected them to be significantly higher.

              Bret






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy