ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dow123]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-dow123] GNSO website

  • To: <KathrynKL@xxxxxxx>, <gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] GNSO website
  • From: "Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:42:33 -0500

Neither the GNSO posting nor the ICANN posting seems to include the
sentence that Kathy suggested, warning people that after submitting a
comment they will need to respond to an automated message verifying the
submission.  Can this be added?  
 
Also the GNSO posting refers to this as the "Final Preliminary Task
Force Report," which is confusing.  Perhaps it should be changed to
conform to the ICANN posting, "Preliminary Task Force Report."   

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of KathrynKL@xxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 8:53 AM
To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-dow123] GNSO website


Glen and Maria:
Thanks for the broad posting of our report.  The GNSO website, however,
does not make clear that there is a public comment period associated
with the Preliminary Task Force report.  Would it be possible to
expeditiously include the same line from the ICANN homepage:  The
"Preliminary Task Force Report on the Purpose of Whois and of the Whois
Contacts" has been posted.
<http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-18jan06.htm> 
Public Comments are open from 19 January 2006 to 08 February 2006.

Further, the link on the GNSO website should go to the Request for
Comments page, not straight into the report. That gives people links to
the report, comments email and archives.
Again, I think the ICANN homepage gets this right and if the GNSO page
follows, all will be well.
 
Thanks,
Kathy
 
 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy