Re: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois and Whois con...

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve - a second question;

You have changed the subsection titles to include the word "selected'. 
Is it your view that the summary presented is not a complete summary of 
the arguments presented in favor of, and against, each proposition? If 
the summaries aren't exhaustive, it would be helpful point out precisely 
which arguments weren't presented. Above all else, the summaries need to 
paint a complete picture of the range of views and arguments submitted. 
I don't agree with the request made by others to summarize each and 
every comment without regard to their content, but to the extent that 
commentors are *adding* to the discussion (i.e. bringing forward new 
views and arguments for and against that we haven't heard within the TF 
and are not otherwise contained in the report) then we should hear those 
accurate summaries of those statements.

Steve Metalitz wrote:
> Thank you Olof for this constructive proposal.  Attached please find a
> few small edits which I believe would improve it. I am also concerned
> about the precedent set by failing to summarize many of the comments
> received.  I assume this will be a topic for discussion tomorrow.  
>
> Steve Metalitz
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Olof Nordling
> Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:32 AM
> To: jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Paul Stahura'
> Cc: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; GNSO Secretariat
> Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois
> and Whois con...
>
> Jordyn and all,
> While supporting the public comments report as originally drafted, I
> have also followed the ensuing discussion and I am keen to advance
> matters. In order to do this in a pragmatic way, I have prepared a
> slightly reedited and updated version. See attached. 
> Best regards
> Olof 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Jordyn Buchanan
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 9:59 PM
> To: Paul Stahura
> Cc: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois
> and Whois con...
>
> Hi all:
>
> Based on the feedback I've seen so far, most people (including
> Councilors) seem to prefer the call on Tuesday.
>
> So we will have our next call on Tuesday, March 14 at 9:30 AM EST.
>
> During the call we will discuss:
>
> 1) The final report on the purpose of Whois.  Any suggested edits to the
> report should be submitted no later than today.
>
> We will vote on the report (including which formulation you support)
> during the call.
>
> 2) The NCUC's procedural proposal.
>
> Jordyn