Thank you Olof for this constructive proposal. Attached please find a
few small edits which I believe would improve it. I am also concerned
about the precedent set by failing to summarize many of the comments
received. I assume this will be a topic for discussion tomorrow.
Steve Metalitz
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Olof Nordling
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 11:32 AM
To: jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; 'Paul Stahura'
Cc: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; GNSO Secretariat
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois
and Whois con...
Jordyn and all,
While supporting the public comments report as originally drafted, I
have also followed the ensuing discussion and I am keen to advance
matters. In order to do this in a pragmatic way, I have prepared a
slightly reedited and updated version. See attached.
Best regards
Olof
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jordyn Buchanan
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 9:59 PM
To: Paul Stahura
Cc: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Attached! Preliminary tf Report Purpose Whois
and Whois con...
Hi all:
Based on the feedback I've seen so far, most people (including
Councilors) seem to prefer the call on Tuesday.
So we will have our next call on Tuesday, March 14 at 9:30 AM EST.
During the call we will discuss:
1) The final report on the purpose of Whois. Any suggested edits to the
report should be submitted no later than today.
We will vote on the report (including which formulation you support)
during the call.
2) The NCUC's procedural proposal.
Jordyn