ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dow123]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-dow123] NCUC Procedural Proposal - recirculated

  • To: Steve Metalitz <metalitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] NCUC Procedural Proposal - recirculated
  • From: Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:26:15 -0400

This seems to be a bit of a red-herring, but to answer the question, the RAA does not specify whom payment must be secured from. In other words, if the registrar or another party is willing to act as a guarantor for the fees, then it is perfectly reasonable for them to offer names to the public on a no-cost basis. This practice has been in consistent use since early 2000.

Steve Metalitz wrote:
Bruce,

On what basis can "registrars offer domain names for free," in light of
the following provision of the RAA:


3.7.4 Registrar shall not activate any Registered Name unless and until
it is satisfied that it has received a reasonable assurance of payment
of its registration fee.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 1:57 AM
To: gnso-dow123@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dow123] NCUC Procedural Proposal - recirculated


Hello Kathy,
As discussed during the last GNSO Council meeting, the WHOIS task force
does not have as part of its terms of reference a change to the data
being collected. The WHOIS task force is tasked with considering what
data collected should be available for public access, in the context of
the purpose of WHOIS. The WHOIS task force work specifically
addresses the current clause 3.3 "Public Access to Data on Registered
Names" of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) (see
http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-17may01.htm#3.)


While work on considering the data collected may also be a useful area
of policy development, this would require a separate PDP under the
GNSO's processes.  For information, registrars are required to retain
certain information (clause 3.4 "Retention of Registered Name Holder and
Registration Data."), and are also required under clause 3.7 "Business
Dealings, Including with Registered Name Holders." to provide
information on the purpose for which data is collected:

"Registrar shall provide notice to each new or renewed Registered Name
Holder stating:

- The purposes for which any Personal Data collected from the applicant
are intended;

- The intended recipients or categories of recipients of the data
(including the Registry Operator and others who will receive the data
from Registry Operator);

- Which data are obligatory and which data, if any, are voluntary; and

- How the Registered Name Holder or data subject can access and, if
necessary, rectify the data held about them."




Note that the purposes that data is collected may vary by registrar, and registrants should check those purposes. For example some registrars may offer domain names for free, but in return provide the personal information to marketing companies etc.

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
Chair, GNSO.




Regards,

--

                       -rr








"Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions. All life is an experiment. The more experiments you make the better." - Ralph Waldo Emerson


Contact Info:

Ross Rader
Director, Research & Innovation
Tucows Inc.
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783

Get Started: http://start.tucows.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy