Re: [gnso-dow123] NCUC Procedural Proposal - recirculated

[Ross Rader <ross@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve Metalitz wrote:

<snip>

> At the time this provision was first included in the RAA (1999) it was
> viewed as a significant protection against speculative or abusive
> registration.  If the registrar had to get reasonable assurance of
> payment before the registration took effect, it also made it more likely
> that it would know who the registrant was.  Certainly this has some
> relevance to the issue of accuracy of Whois data.    

This is a very interesting interpretation - of many things. Most curious 
is the suggestion that this fantastic extrapolation is somehow relevant 
to the work of this group.

Someone please drop me a note when this group has decided to get back to 
work on the terms of reference. The process discussions and distractions 
have become too much for me to follow everything directly.

Regards,

--

                       -rr








                "Don't be too timid and squeamish about your actions.
                                           All life is an experiment.
                            The more experiments you make the better."
                        - Ralph Waldo Emerson


Contact Info:

Ross Rader
Director, Research & Innovation
Tucows Inc.
t. 416.538.5492
c. 416.828.8783

Get Started: http://start.tucows.com
My Blogware: http://www.byte.org