Re: [gnso-dow123] Voting procedure

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jordyn,

if my recollection is correct you were appointed by the council as a
voting expert similar to Avri.

Best,

tom

Am 31.01.2007 schrieb Jordyn Buchanan:
> Soon, we're going to be called upon to decide what the majority view
> of the task force is.  Since it seems unlikely that we'll be able to
> make this decision based on a unanimous view of the task force, I am
> going to propose that we use the following voting mechanism:
> 
> - Each constituency will receive two votes.  In most cases, we've had
> two representatives from the various constituencies show up within the
> past month or so; although a few constituencies have three members
> that have ever shown up, this seems like a rare ocurrence.  If more
> than two people are likely to show up, I would request that
> constituency chairs identify the voting members.  If your constituency
> won't have two memebers available for some reason, let me know and
> we'll work out some procedure to resolve this.
> 
> - Avri will receive one vote as a voting "expert" appointee to the TF
> by the Council.
> 
> - I will not get a vote as a non-voting "expert" appointee to TF by the 
> council.
> 
> - Wendy, our ALAC representative, will not get a vote.  But if the
> ALAC has comments, it may be reasonable to include them.  Same goes
> for Suzanne, our GAC representative.
> 
> Please let me know if you have comments, questions or concerns about
> this procedure.
> 
> Jordyn
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w