ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dow123]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-dow123] Final Task Force Report on Whois Services

  • To: jordyn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-dow123] Final Task Force Report on Whois Services
  • From: "David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:30:13 -0600

Jordyn:
Your wording is correct for the Registry Constituency. Milton's wording is not correct.
David


At 04:23 PM 3/6/2007, Jordyn Buchanan wrote:
I actually lifted that sentence almost directly from an e-mail from a
registry constituency rep, but I'm glad to allow them to clarify this
point.

Jordyn

On 3/6/07, Milton Mueller <Mueller@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I have reviewed only the executive summary. Not bad, overall. One
modification that needs to be made in this sentence:

"The Registry Constituency, which voted in favor of the OPOC proposal,
believes that considerable work still needs to be done to address the
issue of access to non-public Whois information by law enforcement and
others with a legitimate need for access."

My understanding is that the RyC's support access for law enforcement
but not necessarily "others." Therefore the last part of this sentence
must be stricken as it does not reflect their consensus views, and
should read as follows:

""The Registry Constituency, which voted in favor of the OPOC proposal,
believes that considerable work still needs to be done to address the
issue of access to non-public Whois information by law enforcement."






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy