Re: [gnso-dow123] Final Task Force Report on Whois Services

["Jordyn Buchanan" <jordyn.buchanan@xxxxxxxxx>]

I actually lifted that sentence almost directly from an e-mail from a
registry constituency rep, but I'm glad to allow them to clarify this
point.

Jordyn

On 3/6/07, Milton Mueller <Mueller@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I have reviewed only the executive summary. Not bad, overall. One
> modification that needs to be made in this sentence:
>
> "The Registry Constituency, which voted in favor of the OPOC proposal,
> believes that considerable work still needs to be done to address the
> issue of access to non-public Whois information by law enforcement and
> others with a legitimate need for access."
>
> My understanding is that the RyC's support access for law enforcement
> but not necessarily "others." Therefore the last part of this sentence
> must be stricken as it does not reflect their consensus views, and
> should read as follows:
>
> ""The Registry Constituency, which voted in favor of the OPOC proposal,
> believes that considerable work still needs to be done to address the
> issue of access to non-public Whois information by law enforcement."