<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: questions to Verisign
- To: "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>, "Marilyn Cade" <marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Mike Rodenbaugh" <mxr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: questions to Verisign
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:27:13 -0400
I have only been casually observing this list, but let me point out that
there is no way that we (VeriSign) would be able to provide any
'registrar specific data' other than what is already contained in
publicly posted reports because it is classified Registry Sensitive
information. To do otherwise would be violating our customers' trust.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olof Nordling
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 12:05 PM
To: 'Marilyn Cade'; 'Mike Rodenbaugh'; gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: questions to Verisign
Marilyn (and all),
Thanks for your question, but I'm a bit bewildered by it -
You're asking for a fitting of registrars into "these" categories, but I
can't see any categories referenced to fit them into. Please explain so
a poor Swede understands....
Best
Olof
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marilyn Cade
Sent: den 23 augusti 2007 20:58
To: Mike Rodenbaugh; gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: questions to Verisign
Thanks, Jeff and Mike.
I recommend that we just ensure that the request asks that the
stats be separately reported by .net and .com.
Overall, I'd assume that all of the stats gathered will need to
be TLD specific. That would be helpful overall, as ICANN moves into a
more professional role in its gathering and publication of industry
statistics, to have all stats related to individual TLD.
A question for the Staff. Where will the stats come from that
show which registrars, and how many, fit into each of these categories?
Is that a ICANN staff reporting, or a registry report?
Marilyn S. Cade
202 360 1196
________________________________
Subject: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: questions to Verisign
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:20:47 -0700
From: mxr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Jeff Neuman and I have agreed to the following request to
Verisign, and would like any feedback or suggested changes from the
group by next Tuesday please.
We ask for stats at least for the last one year period -- July
1, 2006 through June 30, 2007 (since all of their earnings for this
period have been announced) - and further historical data would be
greatly appreciated as well:
a) How many domains were registered and subsequently
deleted within 5 days during each month, quarter and year? This should
be broken out by each registrar as well.
b) What percentage of all adds are grace deleted -- in
total and broken down by registrar?
c) How many domains have been registered, deleted, and
re-registered? Please provide a breakdown of these stats by number of
times a domain was re-registered within one year. For example:
a. X number of domain names have not been re-registered
during this one year period
b. Y number of domain names have been re-registered once
during this time period
c. Z number of domain names have been re-registered twice
during this time period
d. AA number of domain names have been re-registered between
3 and 5 times
e. BB number of domain names have been re-registered between
5 and 10 times
f. CC number of domain names have been re-registered between
10 and 20 times
DD number of domain name have been re-registered more than 20
times
Mike Rodenbaugh
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|