ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dt-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: questions to Verisign

  • To: "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>, "Mike Rodenbaugh" <mxr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: questions to Verisign
  • From: marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 06:59:09 +0000

That is interesting. I don't think anyone was getting customer specific data, 
though. As to reports about the registrars that have the highest number of 
drops and readds, i thought was already reported?
Regards,
Marilyn Cade


-----Original Message-----
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:27:13 
To:"Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>,       "Marilyn Cade" 
<marilynscade@xxxxxxxxxxx>,       "Mike Rodenbaugh" <mxr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
<gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: questions to Verisign


I have only been casually observing this list, but let me point out that there 
is no way that we (VeriSign) would be able to provide any 'registrar specific 
data' other than what is already contained in publicly posted reports because 
it is classified Registry Sensitive information.  To do otherwise would be 
violating our customers' trust. 
  
Chuck Gomes 
  
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it 
is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and 
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, 
distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the 
original transmission." 
 
 
 
----------------
 From: owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Olof Nordling
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 12:05 PM
To: 'Marilyn Cade'; 'Mike Rodenbaugh'; gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: questions to Verisign

 
 
 
Marilyn (and all), 
Thanks for your question, but I’m a bit bewildered by it – You’re asking for a 
fitting of registrars into “these” categories, but I can’t see any categories 
referenced to fit them into. Please explain so a poor Swede understands…. 
Best 
Olof 
  
 
 
----------------
 
From: owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
Of Marilyn Cade
Sent: den 23 augusti 2007 20:58
To: Mike Rodenbaugh; gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: questions to Verisign 
  
Thanks, Jeff and Mike.
 
I recommend that we just ensure that the request asks that the stats be 
separately reported by .net and .com. 
 
Overall, I'd assume that all of the stats gathered will need to be TLD 
specific. That would be helpful overall, as ICANN moves into a more 
professional role in its gathering and publication of industry statistics, to 
have all stats related to individual TLD. 
 
A question for the Staff. Where will the stats come from that show which 
registrars, and how many, fit into each of these categories? Is that a ICANN 
staff reporting, or a registry report? 
 

Marilyn S. Cade
202 360 1196 


 
 
----------------
 
Subject: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: questions to Verisign
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:20:47 -0700
From: mxr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
 
Jeff Neuman and I have agreed to the following request to Verisign, and would 
like any feedback or suggested changes from the group by next Tuesday please. 
  
We ask for stats at least for the last one year period -- July 1, 2006 through 
June 30, 2007 (since all of their earnings for this period have been announced) 
– and further historical data would be greatly appreciated as well: 
  
a)        How many domains were registered and subsequently deleted within 5 
days during each month, quarter and year?  This should be broken out by each 
registrar as well. 
b)        What percentage of all adds are grace deleted -- in total and broken 
down by registrar? 
c)        How many domains have been registered, deleted, and re-registered?  
Please provide a breakdown of these stats by number of times a domain was 
re-registered within one year.  For example: 
a.    X number of domain names have not been re-registered during this one year 
period 
b.    Y number of domain names have been re-registered once during this time 
period 
c.    Z number of domain names have been re-registered twice during this time 
period 
d.    AA number of domain names have been re-registered between 3 and 5 times 
e.    BB number of domain names have been re-registered between 5 and 10 times 
f.    CC number of domain names have been re-registered between 10 and 20 times 
DD number of domain name have been re-registered more than 20 times 
  
Mike Rodenbaugh




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy