<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-dt-wg] domain tasting follow up
- To: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-dt-wg] domain tasting follow up
- From: Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:48:35 -0700
Thanks, Liz. I don't want to slow down the process or push back the
other deadlines. So we will update our comment as long as it is not
a problem for the schedule.
Thanks,
Robin
On Mar 31, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Liz Gasster wrote:
We have also not received updated statements yet from the ISPs or
from the registrars. Unless the Council decides otherwise, I am
still planning to prepare a final report by Friday as directed, so
it would be difficult to meet that deadline and incorporate NCUC
comments.
We can discuss this further tomorrow, but from a staff perspective,
if the Council agreed to extend the deadline until this Friday for
constituency statements, I could complete final report by Tuesday
the 8th. I know there is urgency to meet the deadlines set forth
in the earlier motion, but I think we could accommodate Robin’s
request in parallel with your plan to “finalize” the motion by the
10th (1 week before the next Council meeting).
Thanks, Liz
From: owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dt-
wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robin Gross
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 4:13 PM
To: Liz Gasster
Cc: gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dt-wg] domain tasting follow up
NCUC would like to submit an updated statement in light of the
motion, so we'd like to request an extension in which to file it
until Friday if possible.
Thanks,
Robin
On Mar 28, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Liz Gasster wrote:
All,
Attached is the ALAC's updated constituency statement on domain
tasting. I note Chuck's earlier update that the registry
constituency statement will be forthcoming. That's what I am aware
of so far. Could others provide updates for the team?
Is there consensus for a call on Tuesday at usual time (1:00
Pacific time)? Glen and I can set that up.
Thanks, Liz
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 8:44 AM
To: Olof Nordling; Liz Gasster
Subject: ALAC update regarding DT
Olof and/or Liz (not sure who is handling this),
Following is the update to the ALAC "Constituency" Statement on
Domain Tasting.
Alan
==========================================
The At Large Advisory Committee has consulted with its constituent
bodies regarding the proposed GNSO Council motion on Domain Tasting.
Some constituents would have preferred to see a more aggressive
recommendation - specifically to eliminate the Add Grace Period
entirely. However, the ALAC recognizes that compared to some
alternative suggested ways of addressing domain tasting (such as
using a 90% threshold instead of 10%, a more modest "restocking fee",
more studies, or simply letting the domain name market evolve without
intervention), the proposed action is relatively aggressive.
Given that the proposed motion includes the requirement to monitor
the implementation and effectiveness of the proposed limitations on
the AGP, the ALAC unanimously supports the proposed motion.
IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|