ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-dt-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-dt-wg] domain tasting follow up

  • To: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-dt-wg] domain tasting follow up
  • From: Robin Gross <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:48:35 -0700

Thanks, Liz. I don't want to slow down the process or push back the other deadlines. So we will update our comment as long as it is not a problem for the schedule.

Thanks,
Robin


On Mar 31, 2008, at 4:44 PM, Liz Gasster wrote:

We have also not received updated statements yet from the ISPs or from the registrars. Unless the Council decides otherwise, I am still planning to prepare a final report by Friday as directed, so it would be difficult to meet that deadline and incorporate NCUC comments.

We can discuss this further tomorrow, but from a staff perspective, if the Council agreed to extend the deadline until this Friday for constituency statements, I could complete final report by Tuesday the 8th. I know there is urgency to meet the deadlines set forth in the earlier motion, but I think we could accommodate Robin’s request in parallel with your plan to “finalize” the motion by the 10th (1 week before the next Council meeting).

Thanks, Liz

From: owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dt- wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Robin Gross
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 4:13 PM
To: Liz Gasster
Cc: gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-dt-wg] domain tasting follow up

NCUC would like to submit an updated statement in light of the motion, so we'd like to request an extension in which to file it until Friday if possible.

Thanks,
Robin


On Mar 28, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Liz Gasster wrote:



All,

Attached is the ALAC's updated constituency statement on domain tasting. I note Chuck's earlier update that the registry constituency statement will be forthcoming. That's what I am aware of so far. Could others provide updates for the team?

Is there consensus for a call on Tuesday at usual time (1:00 Pacific time)? Glen and I can set that up.

Thanks, Liz

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 8:44 AM
To: Olof Nordling; Liz Gasster
Subject: ALAC update regarding DT

Olof and/or Liz (not sure who is handling this),

Following is the update to the ALAC "Constituency" Statement on Domain Tasting.

Alan
==========================================


The At Large Advisory Committee has consulted with its constituent
bodies regarding the proposed GNSO Council motion on Domain Tasting.

Some constituents would have preferred to see a more aggressive
recommendation - specifically to eliminate the Add Grace Period
entirely. However, the ALAC recognizes that compared to some
alternative suggested ways of addressing domain tasting (such as
using a 90% threshold instead of 10%, a more modest "restocking fee",
more studies, or simply letting the domain name market evolve without
intervention), the proposed action is relatively aggressive.

Given that the proposed motion includes the requirement to monitor
the implementation and effectiveness of the proposed limitations on
the AGP, the ALAC unanimously supports the proposed motion.




IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx







IP JUSTICE
Robin Gross, Executive Director
1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy