<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Regarding private/sensitive information
- To: "'Mike O'Connor'" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Fast Flux Workgroup'" <gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Regarding private/sensitive information
- From: "Greg Aaron" <gaaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:55:23 -0400
Dear Mike:
I don't feel that solution is satisfactory. The info I mailed was of
interest to the entire group, and solicited the collective expertise of the
group.
Perhaps we should work on making the private wiki a more conducive place for
posting threads of this nature? We need a place where sensitive information
is visible to the entire group. And may be counterproductive to have
totally offline, side conversations that miss someone who may have something
pertinent to say.
Thanks,
--Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-ff-pdp-may08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:01 AM
To: Fast Flux Workgroup
Subject: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Regarding private/sensitive information
Dear all,
I've had a chance to sleep on the puzzler of maintaining private
*and* public conversations for the working group.
I've arrived at the following. Given the nature of our group, I
think private-list conversation isn't really feasible. So I'd like
to propose the following;
- Posts to the group are public
- Private/sensitive information can be exchanged between individuals,
off-list, based on individual trust relationships
- Conclusions from those private conversations can be sanitized and
posted to the public list
Simple, no? I've had several off-list conversations about this and
have concluded that handling "leak containment" is beyond me. :-)
So -- don't post sensitive information to the list.
onward,
m
voice: 651-647-6109
fax: 866-280-2356
web: www.haven2.com
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|