Re: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Wiki Posting

[RLVaughn <RL_Vaughn@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Mike O'Connor wrote:
> eek!  i hope i didn't quash other ideas -- i didn't mean to hint at that 
> at all.  ugh...
I am quashless and rank everyone else here equally so.
Please regard my hint remark as another occasion of one of my failures
I neglected to introduce the appropriate smiley and the appropriate
section.

Please rest and meditate on healing things and places :) :) :)


> just a note to you all -- Randy posted his (terrific) case to the 
> PRIVATE wiki, not our normal public one.  to pile on -- please don't let 
> it out into the wild (by posting links to it on the public wiki, or to 
> this email list).
Thanks for mentioning that Mike!

> m
>
> At 04:22 PM 8/19/2008, RLVaughn wrote:
>
> > I have posted a case study on the wiki.  All opinions
> > expressed therein are mine.
> >
> > The case is very much a "live" case in that it exposes victim
> > IPs and fastflux domain names.  I regard these data as sensitive
> > but essential to the study.  I have made some redactions
> > to some data which I consider to be too sensitive to release.  Those
> > redactions and my rationale for not releasing them will be obvious
> > to the reader.
> >
> > I seem to recall Mike hinting the case may do little if anything
> > to help with issues of definitions, approaches, or solutions
> > to the problems at hand.  It may, however, serve as some foundational
> > material for those interested in the workings of an alleged fastflux
> > network.
> >
> > I hope you find the writing to be not as horrible as you have every
> > right to expect.
> >
> > Randy
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 
> > 270.6.5/1620 - Release Date: 8/19/2008 6:04 AM