<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Mannheim score concerns - pop the stack
- To: Fast Flux Workgroup <gnso-ff-pdp-May08@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-ff-pdp-may08] Mannheim score concerns - pop the stack
- From: Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:45:24 -0700
As much as I love this thread, I am reminded how often we were unable to come
to closure on issues because we didn't pause to take action when opportunities
presented themselves.
Can we pop the stack a bit and tease out the high level concerns?
1. strictly automated or automated with human participation?
2. concern over the efficacy of the algorithm over time?
3. is the WG advocating one and only one algorithm?
Is there agreement that these represent at least minority concerns?
Can we agree to identify these as concerns in the report?
George, will you provide Marika with some assistance in preparing something
accurate and succinct?
(Christian made a good observation that we don't want to overwhelm the GNSO and
constituencies with more detail than they need on each point we make.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|