Re: [gnso-frn-dt] weekly status report

["Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry I've missed the last couple of calls..

The questions look good

Regards

Michele

Mr. Michele Neylon
Blacknight
http://Blacknight.tel

Via iPhone so excuse typos and brevity

On 17 Dec 2011, at 17:17, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> Mikey & Team:
> 
> 
> This looks like a good list.  We may want to add some reassurances about
> not asking Registrars to divulge any competitive information or "secret
> sauce."  I don't see anything on the list that's too egregious, but it's
> difficult to predict how others might respond.
> 
> Also:  Can we impose upon Staff to put this in the form of a doodle poll
> or survey monkey thing?  It might simplify the distribution of the
> questions and help us track responses.
> 
> 
> Thanks--
> 
> 
> J.
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-frn-dt] weekly status report
> From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, December 17, 2011 10:49 am
> To: gnso-frn-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> hi all,
> 
> here's the status report for the week. we're chugging right along.
> here's the current state of our "questions to registrars" for you to
> review.
> 
> What is the source of complaints you receive?
> Customers?
> Other Registrars?
> Do you view the number of complaints as a significant burden/cost or a
> rather minor issue?
> Not very significant
> Significant burden
> Extremely burdensome
> Is there a trend (up, down, steady)?
> Are you seeing the same players or are there new ones entering -- is
> this proliferating?
> Where are they coming from?
> An entity connected to ICANN? How?
> Registrar
> Reseller
> Other
> What country are they coming from?
> Canada
> US
> UK
> Other
> What is the mechanism you use to govern your resellers to prevent FRNs?
> By contract?
> By limiting capability through the API?
> Other?
> Combination of the above?
> Representative examples of notices
> Impact on your operation or customers?
> Cost
> Lost customers
> Other
> What "holes" do you see in the new RAA? Do you think it provides
> sufficient mechanisms to address FRNs?
> What do feel is an appropriate role for ICANN in addressing this issue?
> 
> please take a look at these before the call this Thursday (yes, there
> *is* going to be a call on Thursday -- at our new time -- at 1930 UDT --
> think of it as the FRN Holiday Party). i'm hopeful that we can wrap
> these up this week and push them along to the Registrars over the
> holidays.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> mikey
> 
> 
> - - - - - - - - -
> phone 651-647-6109 
> fax 866-280-2356 
> web http://www.haven2.com
> handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google,
> etc.)
> 
>