<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-geo-dg] ICANN Board Motion on Geo Diversity
- To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-geo-dg] ICANN Board Motion on Geo Diversity
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:13:20 -0400
Thanks Tim.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 9:28 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: gnso-geo-dg@xxxxxxxxx; Olga Cavalli
> Subject: RE: [gnso-geo-dg] ICANN Board Motion on Geo Diversity
>
> Sorry for the belated comments, just getting back on track
> after a long vacation.
>
> I agree with revising *citizenship* to *citizenship or
> domicile* as Chuck suggests. And I agree that defining what
> lengthin time is reasonable, we don't have to go into that in
> our statement. We are just suggesting principles and the
> details will be worked out within the group once it is formed.
>
> Tim
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [gnso-geo-dg] ICANN Board Motion on Geo Diversity
> From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, September 05, 2008 11:06 am
> To: "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <gnso-geo-dg@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Good points Olga. I would like to hear from our geo group
> how people react to changing 'citizenship' in our comments to
> "citizenship or domincile". Because Tim was a strong
> advocate of this, I especially would like to see his thoughts
> about this.
>
> Chuck
>
> From: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:24 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: gnso-geo-dg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-geo-dg] ICANN Board Motion on Geo Diversity
>
>
>
> Chuck,
> I agree with you that this possible flexibility for the
> NonCom appointed directors is relevant to our discussion and
> also for selecting good candidates for the Board.
> In general reading the outcomes of our document, the set of
> principles that we drafted also brings flexibility to the
> geo-reginos issue.
> I can think of only one principle that may have a different
> perspective:
> 4. Geographic requirements relevant to membership of ICANN
> bodies should be measured by citizenship.
> Also, reading the text of the Board preliminary report some
> questions comes to my mind.
>
> It says "some of the candidates have often lived in a country
> for many years,.."
>
> and
>
> "given that many people have lived for long periods of time
> in, and represent the interests of, countries in which they
> may not be citizens...." Defining what "many years" and "long
> periods of time" will be relevant to make this flexibility effective.
>
> Have a nice weekend!
> Regards
> Olga
>
>
>
>
> 2008/9/4 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Please note the
> following exerpt from the ICANN Board Preliminary Report of
> its meeting on 28 August. It provides some increased
> flexibility in applying geographical diversity requirements
> for the eight NomCom appointed directors and John Jeffrey
> noted in the discussion that "diversity calculations should
> be consistent for seats 9 though 14". I find this very
> relevant to the recommendation we made in our proposed GNSO
> comments regarding the formation of a community wide WG on
> geo regions; this approach would provide a little more
> flexibility with regard to GNSO director selections if a
> similar motion changes the Bylaws in that regard and it
> provides one exampe of how increased flexibility could be
> provided in meeting geographic diversity requirements on the
> GNSO Council.
>
> Chuck
>
> "Nominating Committee's Recommendation for ICANN Bylaws
> Change regarding Criteria for Board Member Selection John
> Jeffrey presented a proposed Bylaws change and requested that
> the Board permit Management to post the proposed changes for
> public comments.
> Over the past several years, the Nominating Committee has
> expressed concern that being required to count more than one
> country of citizenship for diversity purposes often makes it
> difficult to select the best candidates for the Board seats
> that the Nominating Committee is mandated to fill. In
> carrying out its responsibilities to fill Seats 1 through 8,
> the Nominating Committee shall seek to ensure that the ICANN
> Board is composed of members who in the aggregate display
> diversity in geography, culture, skills, experience, and
> perspective, by applying the criteria set forth in Bylaws.
> The Nominating Committee also noted that some of the
> candidates have often lived in a country for many years, and
> thereby better represent the interests of that country than
> any country of which the candidates may be citizens.
> As the Nominating Committee requested, the General Counsel
> provided the Nominating Committee with suggested Bylaws
> revisions to reflect the Nominating Committee's stated goals.
> In the proposal, domicile, not just citizenship, is to be
> considered in the diversity calculation. The Nominating
> Committee members have unanimously agreed that the proposed
> Bylaws revisions would alleviate the concerns.
> John Jeffrey noted that considering the possibility of
> revising the method for calculating diversity for seats 1
> through 8, staff determined that such diversity calculations
> should be consistent for seats 9 though
> 14 and have proposed revisions accordingly.
> Bruce Tonkin moved and Harald Alvestrand seconded a motion
> that the proposed changes to the bylaws be posted for public
> comment and then considered again by the Board, via the
> following resolution:
> Whereas, the Nominating Committee has expressed concern that,
> pursuant to the Bylaws mandated diversity requirements that
> no more than five Board members be citizens of any one
> geographic region, the Nominating Committee is required to
> count all countries of citizenship for each candidate.
> Whereas, the Nominating Committee has noted that the
> requirement to count all countries of citizenship has caused
> some selection difficulties each year over the past several years.
> Whereas, the Nominating Committee has also expressed concern
> that the calculation is presently limited to citizenship
> given that many people have lived for long periods of time
> in, and represent the interests of, countries in which they
> may not be citizens.
> Whereas, making a diversity calculation pursuant to the ICANN
> Bylaws as it relates to Board member selection for seats 1
> through 14 should be consistent.
> It is hereby resolved (__.2008) that the following proposed
> revisions to Article VI, Sections 2.2 and 2.3, shall be
> posted for public comment in accordance with ICANN's normal
> process for proposed Bylaw revisions."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|