RE: [gnso-geo-dg] proposed bylaw change Nom Com Board - adding domicile

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I more or less agree, but perhaps the reason is that the NomCom needs to
do a lot of its recruiting before any WG is formed, or completes it
work. So the change will allow them to proceed, but there could be
further refinement of the requirement as result of the later WG.

Tim 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-geo-dg] proposed bylaw change Nom Com Board - adding
domicile
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, September 24, 2008 5:53 am
To: <gnso-geo-dg@xxxxxxxxx>

While the proposal to add domicile as well as citizenship for Nominating
Committee Board selection is probably fine, it seems oddly piecemeal to
be proposing it at the same time as the issue of a wider debate on
regions and diversity is being promoted.
I cant see why this part needs to be done NOW. 
It seems to me to be better to have the wider debate first on regions /
citizenship / domicile and then implement a uniform change across ICANN.
Do others agree?
Philip