Re: [gnso-geo-dg] proposed bylaw change Nom Com Board - adding domicile

[Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ken Stubbs wrote:

Having been on the nomcom 2 times, I can tell you that this issue 
surfaced in both years of my tenure.
The recommendations represent  a very good interim solution.

Your comments are right on target here Tim.

Ken Stubbs

Tim Ruiz wrote:
> I more or less agree, but perhaps the reason is that the NomCom needs to
> do a lot of its recruiting before any WG is formed, or completes it
> work. So the change will allow them to proceed, but there could be
> further refinement of the requirement as result of the later WG.
>
> Tim 
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-geo-dg] proposed bylaw change Nom Com Board - adding
> domicile
> From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, September 24, 2008 5:53 am
> To: <gnso-geo-dg@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> While the proposal to add domicile as well as citizenship for Nominating
> Committee Board selection is probably fine, it seems oddly piecemeal to
> be proposing it at the same time as the issue of a wider debate on
> regions and diversity is being promoted.
> I cant see why this part needs to be done NOW. 
> It seems to me to be better to have the wider debate first on regions /
> citizenship / domicile and then implement a uniform change across ICANN.
> Do others agree?
> Philip
>  
>
>
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1683 - Release Date: 9/21/2008 10:10 AM
>