Re: [gnso-geo-dg] proposed bylaw change Nom Com Board - adding domicile

["Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,
I think that some debate about the citizenship / domicile issue is important
at this stage of the discussion.
My concern in relation with domicile, is how anyone can measure the
relevance of citizenship vs. domicile.
If this is not well defined, then several misunderstanding may arise.
Regards
Olga

2008/9/24 Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  Ken Stubbs wrote:
>
> Having been on the nomcom 2 times, I can tell you that this issue surfaced
> in both years of my tenure.
> The recommendations represent  a very good interim solution.
>
> Your comments are right on target here Tim.
>
> Ken Stubbs
>
> Tim Ruiz wrote:
>
> I more or less agree, but perhaps the reason is that the NomCom needs to
> do a lot of its recruiting before any WG is formed, or completes it
> work. So the change will allow them to proceed, but there could be
> further refinement of the requirement as result of the later WG.
>
> Tim
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [gnso-geo-dg] proposed bylaw change Nom Com Board - adding
> domicile
> From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx> <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, September 24, 2008 5:53 am
> To: <gnso-geo-dg@xxxxxxxxx> <gnso-geo-dg@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> While the proposal to add domicile as well as citizenship for Nominating
> Committee Board selection is probably fine, it seems oddly piecemeal to
> be proposing it at the same time as the issue of a wider debate on
> regions and diversity is being promoted.
> I cant see why this part needs to be done NOW.
> It seems to me to be better to have the wider debate first on regions /
> citizenship / domicile and then implement a uniform change across ICANN.
> Do others agree?
> Philip
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
> Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1683 - Release Date: 9/21/2008 
> 10:10 AM
>
>
>
>