<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our call schedule
- To: rmohan@xxxxxxxxxxxx, gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our call schedule
- From: Alistair DIXON <Alistair.Dixon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:35:43 +1300
My preference would be a single weekly call - ie option 1. However, if that is
likely to mean an impossible time (which for me would be between 2 and 5am) for
some and, consequently, regular "forced" absenteeism I think we should go with
the status quo.
Alistair
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ram Mohan
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 6:31 PM
To: gnso-idn-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-idn-wg] Your opinion regarding changing our call schedule
Several WG members suggest that we should collapse the paired calls into
a
single call each week so we can all focus with intensity on our
discussion
rather than attempting to reconcile discussion between the two calls.
The original reason for the paired calls was to achieve momentum on our
task. I believe that we have achieved that goal. I am open to
collapsing
the paired calls into a single call each week, with an alternating time
schedule so that different parts of the world are inconvenienced each
week.
Please write in to the list your preference:
1) Single weekly call, alternating between earlier & late time slots
each
week, each call now extending for 120 minutes (2 hours)
2) Status quo (paired calls, each 90 minutes)
Regards,
-Ram
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|