FW: [Fwd: RE: [gnso-idncctlds-wg] Draft for final review of GNSO comments re. the ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper]
The document we will be using on Google Accounts on Monday is at the link provided below by Olof. Note that it will not show the markups so I suggest that you also have the Word version I attached available online as well if that is possible. The attached version should also be reviewed before the meeting so that you can readily see the latest edits that were made. Chuck Gomes "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." -----Original Message----- From: Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 4:31 AM To: 'GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; Gomes, Chuck Subject: RE: [Fwd: RE: [gnso-idncctlds-wg] Draft for final review of GNSO comments re. the ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper] Chuck, Glen, I've uploaded it as a new file on http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dgw6snvn_0g6zxgd Lost the mark-ups, though, so it's a clean version with the comments appearing as footnotes. Anyway, it's there with a bit of beginner's luck :-) If that's OK, please forward to list. Otherwise, if we need the redline version posted, perhaps Tin Wee could help out. Best Olof -----Original Message----- From: GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: den 16 augusti 2007 20:35 To: Gomes, Chuck; Olof Nordling; GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Fwd: RE: [gnso-idncctlds-wg] Draft for final review of GNSO comments re. the ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper] Thanks so much Chuck. Olof can you load this up, I can perhaps see if I can do it as well, then we send out the url to the group. Thanks Glen -------- Message original -------- Sujet: RE: [gnso-idncctlds-wg] Draft for final review of GNSO comments re. the ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:14:31 -0400 De: Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Pour: Olof Nordling <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>, Glen De Saint Géry <glen@xxxxxxxxx> Glen/Olaf, Let's use the attached version for our meeting on Monday. It contains all of Olaf's latest edits plus one small one I found. Chuck Gomes "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Olof Nordling [mailto:olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx] *Sent:* Thursday, August 16, 2007 10:46 AM *To:* Gomes, Chuck *Subject:* RE: [gnso-idncctlds-wg] Draft for final review of GNSO comments re. the ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper Hi Chuck, I?ve been nitpicking again (can?t resist that temptation, seemingly..) and came up with the attached redline version ? a few really small typos etc, nothing of substance, so I just send it for your consideration for the next/final list version. Best regards Olof ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* owner-gnso-idncctlds-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idncctlds-wg@xxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Gomes, Chuck *Sent:* den 15 augusti 2007 00:51 *To:* gnso-idncctlds-wg@xxxxxxxxx *Subject:* [gnso-idncctlds-wg] Draft for final review of GNSO comments re. the ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper *Importance:* High The attached document is ready for final review and editing by our small group. I attempted to highlight all changes made in today's meeting but I would appreciate it if those who were on the call would verify to make sure I did it accurately. For those not on the call, we finished going through all of the comments and proposed edits that group members had submitted for the entire document. This will be our plan of attack in our final teleconference call this next Monday: 1. Review, discuss and finalize the edits made in today's call 2. Identify, discuss and finalize any other portions of the document that any group members flag for additional consideration. Action items for all group members, to be completed before our call this coming Monday: 1. Read the entire document to identify any sections that you think need further discussion and/or possible edits and be prepared to communicate them in our final meeting or earlier 2. Be prepared to communicate your support or lack of support for the final document; if there are any portions of the document that you cannot support, be ready to submit a minority statement explaining your concerns not later than 24 hours after the final document is distributed to the list following our final meeting. 3. Submit any comments or questions to the list for online discussion between now and our final meeting. 4. It would be extremely helpful if everyone can participate in our final teleconference call, but if you cannot, please do the following: 1) understand that this meeting will be the final opportunity for input into the final document; 2) notify me in advance of your inability to participate; 3) at least 24 hours before the final meeting, communicate via the list any points you want to make or edits you want to suggest for any part of the document; 4) communicate your support or lack of support for the document and whether you anticipate submitting a minority statement within 24 hours after the final document is distributed to the list following our final meeting. Action items for Mark McFadden, needed NLT Sunday morning, 19 August: 1. Write and submit text to the list for consideration as an additional paragraph just prior to the start of Section A. (See comment 1 in the document.) In particular, you made the following comment: : " I believe that we might consider a set of general, overall principles by which we formed our answer. For instance, some text that urges the ccNSO, GAC and interested governments to address those policy issues that are specific to ccTLD issues. In addition, there is the principle that operational and general policy issues are guided by the GNSO's ongoing work on the introduction of new gTLDs and IDNs. I think a separate paragraph, prior to the detailed comments would be helpful and I would be happy to supply some text that goes after this paragraph." 2. Write and submit text to the list for consideration as an addition to the proposed GNSO response for the following question on page 14: "/c) How will such issues as competing requests (both domestic and international) be dealt with?/" For reference, you made the following comment in your original review of the document: ?I think there needs to be a richer answer here. In a perfect world there would be no competing requests and the idea of an international competing request is a concept that makes very little sense to me. DO you think they meant those situations where .ORG supported Cyrillic? I'm not clear on what is being "competed" for in this question. When I read the question I thought it meant competing registries for ccTLD representation in other scripts. Can we chat on this one? I'd be happy to supply text, but perhaps I don't understand the question properly." (See comment 2 in the document.) Action item for Glen: Take whatever steps are necessary in advance of our final meeting so that we can all view the document live during our call. Chuck Gomes "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." -- Glen de Saint Géry GNSO Secretariat - ICANN gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org Attachment:
ccNSO GAC Issues Paper re IN ccTLD - Draft GNSO Comments Aug 14 (3) ONedits.doc
|