Re: [gnso-idng] Process & Membership of IDNG WG

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Edmon,

I'm fine with your approach. On the membership, are you suggesting that any
number of GNSO Council members or GAC members be allowed in the WG?

Thanks,

Stéphane 


Le 17/04/09 12:03, « Edmon Chung » <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> With a potential (1) Purpose and (2) Scope drafted, would like to consider 2
> more things
> 3. Process for the development of feasible methods for fast track approach
> 4. Membership of the IDNG Working Group
> 
> Learning from the IDNC WG, I think we can produce 2 reports (instead of 3 --
> the IDNC Interim/Proposed Methodology and Final Report were similar).
> Thereupon, a finalized "Final Report" could be presented for adoption by GNSO
> Council and the board.
> 
> So, for 3. Process, adjusting from the IDNC WG, the IDNG WG would produce 2
> reports:
> - IDNG Initial Report
> - IDNG Final Report
> Each should include a public comment period.
> 
> - IDNG Initial Report
> This would be a stock taking document identifying all the issues that needs to
> be taken into consideration (such as those raised by Stéphane and others),
> along with some possible options/principles for implementing an IDN gTLD Fast
> Track.
> 
> - IDNG Final Report
> The Final Report should review and analyze the comments received from the
> public comment period, and develop a set of principles and procedural
> framework for implementing an IDN gTLD Fast Track. The Final Report should
> also take into consideration the then current drafts for IDN ccTLD Fast Track
> Implementation Draft and the New gTLD Applicant Guidebook to provide specific
> directives implementable by staff.
> 
> 
> As for 4. Membership of the IDNG WG, a possible composition may be as follows:
> 
> Members of the GNSO and the GNSO Council;
> Members of the GAC;
> Two (2) members of the ccNSO;
> Two (2) members of the At-Large and/or the ALAC;
> One (1) representative of technical community;
> One (1) member of the SSAC: and
> Two (2) ICANN staff members.
> 
> 
> Thoughts? 
> 
> Edmon
> 
> 
> 
>