ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-idng]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-idng] Process & Membership of IDNG WG

  • To: "Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Process & Membership of IDNG WG
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:20:17 -0400

Seems okay to me.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 6:04 AM
> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-idng] Process & Membership of IDNG WG
> 
> 
> With a potential (1) Purpose and (2) Scope drafted, would 
> like to consider 2 more things 3. Process for the development 
> of feasible methods for fast track approach 4. Membership of 
> the IDNG Working Group
> 
> Learning from the IDNC WG, I think we can produce 2 reports 
> (instead of 3 -- the IDNC Interim/Proposed Methodology and 
> Final Report were similar).  Thereupon, a finalized "Final 
> Report" could be presented for adoption by GNSO Council and the board.
> 
> So, for 3. Process, adjusting from the IDNC WG, the IDNG WG 
> would produce 2 reports:
> - IDNG Initial Report
> - IDNG Final Report
> Each should include a public comment period.
> 
> - IDNG Initial Report
> This would be a stock taking document identifying all the 
> issues that needs to be taken into consideration (such as 
> those raised by Stéphane and others), along with some 
> possible options/principles for implementing an IDN gTLD Fast Track.
> 
> - IDNG Final Report
> The Final Report should review and analyze the comments 
> received from the public comment period, and develop a set of 
> principles and procedural framework for implementing an IDN 
> gTLD Fast Track. The Final Report should also take into 
> consideration the then current drafts for IDN ccTLD Fast 
> Track Implementation Draft and the New gTLD Applicant 
> Guidebook to provide specific directives implementable by staff.
> 
> 
> As for 4. Membership of the IDNG WG, a possible composition 
> may be as follows:
> 
> Members of the GNSO and the GNSO Council; Members of the GAC; 
> Two (2) members of the ccNSO; Two (2) members of the At-Large 
> and/or the ALAC; One (1) representative of technical 
> community; One (1) member of the SSAC: and Two (2) ICANN 
> staff members.
> 
> 
> Thoughts? 
> 
> Edmon
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy