<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-idng] Process & Membership of IDNG WG
- To: "Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Process & Membership of IDNG WG
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:20:17 -0400
Seems okay to me.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 6:04 AM
> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-idng] Process & Membership of IDNG WG
>
>
> With a potential (1) Purpose and (2) Scope drafted, would
> like to consider 2 more things 3. Process for the development
> of feasible methods for fast track approach 4. Membership of
> the IDNG Working Group
>
> Learning from the IDNC WG, I think we can produce 2 reports
> (instead of 3 -- the IDNC Interim/Proposed Methodology and
> Final Report were similar). Thereupon, a finalized "Final
> Report" could be presented for adoption by GNSO Council and the board.
>
> So, for 3. Process, adjusting from the IDNC WG, the IDNG WG
> would produce 2 reports:
> - IDNG Initial Report
> - IDNG Final Report
> Each should include a public comment period.
>
> - IDNG Initial Report
> This would be a stock taking document identifying all the
> issues that needs to be taken into consideration (such as
> those raised by Stéphane and others), along with some
> possible options/principles for implementing an IDN gTLD Fast Track.
>
> - IDNG Final Report
> The Final Report should review and analyze the comments
> received from the public comment period, and develop a set of
> principles and procedural framework for implementing an IDN
> gTLD Fast Track. The Final Report should also take into
> consideration the then current drafts for IDN ccTLD Fast
> Track Implementation Draft and the New gTLD Applicant
> Guidebook to provide specific directives implementable by staff.
>
>
> As for 4. Membership of the IDNG WG, a possible composition
> may be as follows:
>
> Members of the GNSO and the GNSO Council; Members of the GAC;
> Two (2) members of the ccNSO; Two (2) members of the At-Large
> and/or the ALAC; One (1) representative of technical
> community; One (1) member of the SSAC: and Two (2) ICANN
> staff members.
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Edmon
>
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|