Re: [gnso-idng] Process & Membership of IDNG WG

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for that clarification Edmon.

Stéphane


Le 18/04/09 02:29, « Edmon Chung » <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> That is the suggestion...
> Any number of GNSO Councillors and constituency members in fact.
> And yes, any members of the GAC... the learning from the interaction at the
> IDNC is that it makes it very difficult for the GAC to "select" people into
> a WG.
> Edmon
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
>> Of Stéphane Van Gelder
>> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 1:17 AM
>> To: Edmon Chung; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] Process & Membership of IDNG WG
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Edmon,
>> 
>> I'm fine with your approach. On the membership, are you suggesting that
> any
>> number of GNSO Council members or GAC members be allowed in the WG?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Stéphane
>> 
>> 
>> Le 17/04/09 12:03, « Edmon Chung » <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>> 
>>> 
>>> With a potential (1) Purpose and (2) Scope drafted, would like to
> consider 2
>>> more things
>>> 3. Process for the development of feasible methods for fast track
> approach
>>> 4. Membership of the IDNG Working Group
>>> 
>>> Learning from the IDNC WG, I think we can produce 2 reports (instead of
> 3 --
>>> the IDNC Interim/Proposed Methodology and Final Report were similar).
>>> Thereupon, a finalized "Final Report" could be presented for adoption by
> GNSO
>>> Council and the board.
>>> 
>>> So, for 3. Process, adjusting from the IDNC WG, the IDNG WG would
> produce 2
>>> reports:
>>> - IDNG Initial Report
>>> - IDNG Final Report
>>> Each should include a public comment period.
>>> 
>>> - IDNG Initial Report
>>> This would be a stock taking document identifying all the issues that
> needs to
>>> be taken into consideration (such as those raised by Stéphane and
> others),
>>> along with some possible options/principles for implementing an IDN gTLD
> Fast
>>> Track.
>>> 
>>> - IDNG Final Report
>>> The Final Report should review and analyze the comments received from
> the
>>> public comment period, and develop a set of principles and procedural
>>> framework for implementing an IDN gTLD Fast Track. The Final Report
> should
>>> also take into consideration the then current drafts for IDN ccTLD Fast
> Track
>>> Implementation Draft and the New gTLD Applicant Guidebook to provide
> specific
>>> directives implementable by staff.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> As for 4. Membership of the IDNG WG, a possible composition may be as
> follows:
>>> 
>>> Members of the GNSO and the GNSO Council;
>>> Members of the GAC;
>>> Two (2) members of the ccNSO;
>>> Two (2) members of the At-Large and/or the ALAC;
>>> One (1) representative of technical community;
>>> One (1) member of the SSAC: and
>>> Two (2) ICANN staff members.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>>> 
>>> Edmon
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
>