RE: [gnso-idng] Process & Membership of IDNG WG

["Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That is the suggestion...
Any number of GNSO Councillors and constituency members in fact.
And yes, any members of the GAC... the learning from the interaction at the
IDNC is that it makes it very difficult for the GAC to "select" people into
a WG.
Edmon



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf
> Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 1:17 AM
> To: Edmon Chung; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] Process & Membership of IDNG WG
> 
> 
> Hi Edmon,
> 
> I'm fine with your approach. On the membership, are you suggesting that
any
> number of GNSO Council members or GAC members be allowed in the WG?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> Le 17/04/09 12:03, « Edmon Chung » <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> 
> >
> > With a potential (1) Purpose and (2) Scope drafted, would like to
consider 2
> > more things
> > 3. Process for the development of feasible methods for fast track
approach
> > 4. Membership of the IDNG Working Group
> >
> > Learning from the IDNC WG, I think we can produce 2 reports (instead of
3 --
> > the IDNC Interim/Proposed Methodology and Final Report were similar).
> > Thereupon, a finalized "Final Report" could be presented for adoption by
GNSO
> > Council and the board.
> >
> > So, for 3. Process, adjusting from the IDNC WG, the IDNG WG would
produce 2
> > reports:
> > - IDNG Initial Report
> > - IDNG Final Report
> > Each should include a public comment period.
> >
> > - IDNG Initial Report
> > This would be a stock taking document identifying all the issues that
needs to
> > be taken into consideration (such as those raised by Stéphane and
others),
> > along with some possible options/principles for implementing an IDN gTLD
Fast
> > Track.
> >
> > - IDNG Final Report
> > The Final Report should review and analyze the comments received from
the
> > public comment period, and develop a set of principles and procedural
> > framework for implementing an IDN gTLD Fast Track. The Final Report
should
> > also take into consideration the then current drafts for IDN ccTLD Fast
Track
> > Implementation Draft and the New gTLD Applicant Guidebook to provide
specific
> > directives implementable by staff.
> >
> >
> > As for 4. Membership of the IDNG WG, a possible composition may be as
follows:
> >
> > Members of the GNSO and the GNSO Council;
> > Members of the GAC;
> > Two (2) members of the ccNSO;
> > Two (2) members of the At-Large and/or the ALAC;
> > One (1) representative of technical community;
> > One (1) member of the SSAC: and
> > Two (2) ICANN staff members.
> >
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Edmon
> >
> >
> >
> >