RE: [gnso-idng] Process & Membership of IDNG WG

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

a manner of interaction they seem have used of late is that one or two,
normally the chair or v-chairs participate as gateways to the rest of
the GAC, forwarding messages in both directions. 

a.


On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 08:29 +0800, Edmon Chung wrote:
> That is the suggestion...
> Any number of GNSO Councillors and constituency members in fact.
> And yes, any members of the GAC... the learning from the interaction at the
> IDNC is that it makes it very difficult for the GAC to "select" people into
> a WG.
> Edmon
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> > Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> > Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 1:17 AM
> > To: Edmon Chung; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] Process & Membership of IDNG WG
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Edmon,
> > 
> > I'm fine with your approach. On the membership, are you suggesting that
> any
> > number of GNSO Council members or GAC members be allowed in the WG?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Stéphane
> > 
> > 
> > Le 17/04/09 12:03, « Edmon Chung » <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > 
> > >
> > > With a potential (1) Purpose and (2) Scope drafted, would like to
> consider 2
> > > more things
> > > 3. Process for the development of feasible methods for fast track
> approach
> > > 4. Membership of the IDNG Working Group
> > >
> > > Learning from the IDNC WG, I think we can produce 2 reports (instead of
> 3 --
> > > the IDNC Interim/Proposed Methodology and Final Report were similar).
> > > Thereupon, a finalized "Final Report" could be presented for adoption by
> GNSO
> > > Council and the board.
> > >
> > > So, for 3. Process, adjusting from the IDNC WG, the IDNG WG would
> produce 2
> > > reports:
> > > - IDNG Initial Report
> > > - IDNG Final Report
> > > Each should include a public comment period.
> > >
> > > - IDNG Initial Report
> > > This would be a stock taking document identifying all the issues that
> needs to
> > > be taken into consideration (such as those raised by Stéphane and
> others),
> > > along with some possible options/principles for implementing an IDN gTLD
> Fast
> > > Track.
> > >
> > > - IDNG Final Report
> > > The Final Report should review and analyze the comments received from
> the
> > > public comment period, and develop a set of principles and procedural
> > > framework for implementing an IDN gTLD Fast Track. The Final Report
> should
> > > also take into consideration the then current drafts for IDN ccTLD Fast
> Track
> > > Implementation Draft and the New gTLD Applicant Guidebook to provide
> specific
> > > directives implementable by staff.
> > >
> > >
> > > As for 4. Membership of the IDNG WG, a possible composition may be as
> follows:
> > >
> > > Members of the GNSO and the GNSO Council;
> > > Members of the GAC;
> > > Two (2) members of the ccNSO;
> > > Two (2) members of the At-Large and/or the ALAC;
> > > One (1) representative of technical community;
> > > One (1) member of the SSAC: and
> > > Two (2) ICANN staff members.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Edmon
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> 
> 
> 
>