<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-idng] IDNG WG Motion Draft2
- To: <gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-idng] IDNG WG Motion Draft2
- From: "Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:30:45 +0800
Hi Everyone,
Based on the discussion earlier, I have added 3 additional elements to the
motion to incorporate the concerns:
1. that
2. that no delay
3.
Basically to add 2 more points to the motion (first point below was not changed
from version 1 of the draft motion):
- To recommend to the ICANN Board that an IDNG WG (Internationalized Generic
Top-Level Domain Working Group) be formed under the Proposed Charter for the
IDNG Working Group (IDNG WG).
- To emphasize to the ICANN Board that the full New gTLD process must not be
delayed because of work of the IDNG WG or the subsequent implementation of the
IDNG WG recommendations if they are accepted, and to implement the IDNG WG
recommendations only if the acceptance of IDN gTLD Fast Track applications is
at least 6 months before the then anticipated
- To initiate a GNSO Working Group as a preparation group to start the
discussions, and which should merge into the IDNG WG when formed by the ICANN
Board.
Below is the revised motion (basically added the above to the previous version).
Of course, comments welcome on mailing list.
Lets also try to have a conference call this week if possible suggested 1hr
within:
Wed OR Thu (June 17/18) 21:00-24:00 UTC (=5-8AM next day HKT / 7-10AM next day
Sydney / 2-5PM PT / 5-8PM ET / 11PM-2AM Paris time)
Hope the times could work for most...
Glen, could you please help setup a doodle for the meeting and subsequently the
conf call. Thanks so much.
Edmon
========================================
WHEREAS:
The ICANN community has been discussing issues related to IDN and IDN TLDs
since 2000, and the ICANN board as early as September 2000 recognized "that it
is important that the Internet evolve to be more accessible to those who do not
use the ASCII character set";
There is expressed demand from the community, especially from language
communities around the world who do not use English or a Latin based script as
a primary language, including the CJK (Chinese Japanese Korean) communities and
the right-to-left directional script communities (e.g. Arabic, Hebrew, Persian,
etc.), for advancing the introduction of Internationalized Top-Level Domains
(IDN TLDs);
GNSO IDN WG successfully completed its outcomes report in March 2007 and the
GNSO Council approved the incorporation of its findings in the GNSO Final
Report on the Introduction of New gTLDs in September 2007, describing policy
requirements for the introduction of IDN gTLDs;
The community observes the successful development of the IDN ccTLD Fast Track
based on the IDNC WG recommendations, and the ongoing progress for the
Implementation of the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Process;
The implementation of the New gTLD process is ongoing and the schedule and
development of the implementation should continue;
GNSO Council had made comments in response to the ccNSO-GAC Issues Report on
IDN Issues, as well as in its comments on the IDNC WG Final Report expressed
that “the introduction of IDN gTLDs or IDN ccTLDs should not be delayed because
of lack of readiness of one category, but if they are not introduced at the
same time, steps should be taken so that neither category is advantaged or
disadvantaged, and procedures should be developed to avoid possible conflicts”;
GNSO Council made a resolution in January 2009 to assert that “the GNSO Council
strongly believes that neither the New gTLD or ccTLD fast track process should
result in IDN TLDs in the root before the other unless both the GNSO and ccNSO
so agree”;
An IDN gTLD Fast Track, if successfully implemented, could be introduced in
close proximity with the IDN ccTLD Fast Track in the case that the New gTLD
process is further delayed, and could address the concerns expressed by the
GNSO Council regarding possible conflicts if IDN gTLDs and IDN ccTLDs are not
introduced at the same time.
RESOLVED:
- To recommend to the ICANN Board that an IDNG WG (Internationalized Generic
Top-Level Domain Working Group) be formed under the Proposed Charter for the
IDNG Working Group (IDNG WG).
- To emphasize to the ICANN Board that the full New gTLD process must not be
delayed because of work of the IDNG WG or the subsequent implementation of the
IDNG WG recommendations if they are accepted, and to implement the IDNG WG
recommendations only if the acceptance of IDN gTLD Fast Track applications is
at least 6 months before the then anticipated
- To initiate a GNSO Working Group as a preparation group to start the
discussions, and which should merge into the IDNG WG when formed by the ICANN
Board.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|