Re: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended evaluation.

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

I'm fine with the text we have now. Thanks to all those who worked on drafting 
it and who took our concerns on-board while doing so.

Stéphane

Le 3 mai 2010 à 11:19, Edmon Chung a écrit :

> 
> Was wondering if we need another conference call on this?
> Or I can take the latest draft back to the council?
> Edmon
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
>> Of Adrian Kinderis
>> Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2010 9:58 AM
>> To: Gomes, Chuck; Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended
> evaluation.
>> 
>> 
>> I am ok with it.
>> 
>> Adrian Kinderis
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
>> Of Gomes, Chuck
>> Sent: Saturday, 1 May 2010 8:05 AM
>> To: Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended
> evaluation.
>> 
>> 
>> I support this motion as modified by Avri.  Can we assume that all of us
>> on this list support it?  Anyone opposed?
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>>> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:42 PM
>>> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on
>>> extended evaluation.
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I have accepted Chucks edits and added Tim's recommended change.
>>> 
>>> So does the mean we are done, at least for now, and that
>>> someone from the council will make/second the edited motion
>>> (attached)?
>>> 
>>> If not, please let me know what else needs to be fixed.
>>> 
>>> thanks
>>> 
>>> a.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2846 - Release Date: 05/02/10
> 02:27:00
>