RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended evaluation.

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It seems to me that we are ready for Edmon to make the motion on the Council 
list. Does anyone disagree with this?

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 6:03 AM
> To: Edmon Chung
> Cc: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on 
> extended evaluation.
> 
> 
> I'm fine with the text we have now. Thanks to all those who 
> worked on drafting it and who took our concerns on-board 
> while doing so.
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> Le 3 mai 2010 à 11:19, Edmon Chung a écrit :
> 
> > 
> > Was wondering if we need another conference call on this?
> > Or I can take the latest draft back to the council?
> > Edmon
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf
> >> Of Adrian Kinderis
> >> Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2010 9:58 AM
> >> To: Gomes, Chuck; Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended
> > evaluation.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I am ok with it.
> >> 
> >> Adrian Kinderis
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf
> >> Of Gomes, Chuck
> >> Sent: Saturday, 1 May 2010 8:05 AM
> >> To: Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended
> > evaluation.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> I support this motion as modified by Avri.  Can we assume 
> that all of 
> >> us on this list support it?  Anyone opposed?
> >> 
> >> Chuck
> >> 
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> >>> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> >>> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:42 PM
> >>> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> >>> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended 
> >>> evaluation.
> >>> 
> >>> Hi,
> >>> 
> >>> I have accepted Chucks edits and added Tim's recommended change.
> >>> 
> >>> So does the mean we are done, at least for now, and that someone 
> >>> from the council will make/second the edited motion (attached)?
> >>> 
> >>> If not, please let me know what else needs to be fixed.
> >>> 
> >>> thanks
> >>> 
> >>> a.
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> No virus found in this incoming message.
> >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> >> Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2846 - Release Date: 
> >> 05/02/10
> > 02:27:00
> > 
> 
> 
>