RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended evaluation.

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It doesn't seem to me that we need another call.  We just need the
motion to be made.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung
> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:19 AM
> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on 
> extended evaluation.
> 
> 
> Was wondering if we need another conference call on this?
> Or I can take the latest draft back to the council?
> Edmon
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> > Of Adrian Kinderis
> > Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2010 9:58 AM
> > To: Gomes, Chuck; Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended
> evaluation.
> > 
> > 
> > I am ok with it.
> > 
> > Adrian Kinderis
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf
> > Of Gomes, Chuck
> > Sent: Saturday, 1 May 2010 8:05 AM
> > To: Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended
> evaluation.
> > 
> > 
> > I support this motion as modified by Avri.  Can we assume 
> that all of 
> > us on this list support it?  Anyone opposed?
> > 
> > Chuck
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > > Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:42 PM
> > > To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended 
> > > evaluation.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have accepted Chucks edits and added Tim's recommended change.
> > >
> > > So does the mean we are done, at least for now, and that someone 
> > > from the council will make/second the edited motion (attached)?
> > >
> > > If not, please let me know what else needs to be fixed.
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > a.
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2846 - Release Date: 
> > 05/02/10
> 02:27:00
> 
>