Re: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended evaluation.

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I agree, until and unless we get another more specific mandate from the council 
I do not believe there is anything left for this DT to do.

I mean unless someone, esp from among the members of the list who have been 
very quiet, has a serious problem with the draft motion/letter that can't be 
resolved on the list.

a.

On 3 May 2010, at 08:39, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> 
> It doesn't seem to me that we need another call.  We just need the
> motion to be made.
> 
> Chuck 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Edmon Chung
>> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:19 AM
>> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on 
>> extended evaluation.
>> 
>> 
>> Was wondering if we need another conference call on this?
>> Or I can take the latest draft back to the council?
>> Edmon
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf
>>> Of Adrian Kinderis
>>> Sent: Sunday, May 2, 2010 9:58 AM
>>> To: Gomes, Chuck; Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended
>> evaluation.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I am ok with it.
>>> 
>>> Adrian Kinderis
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf
>>> Of Gomes, Chuck
>>> Sent: Saturday, 1 May 2010 8:05 AM
>>> To: Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended
>> evaluation.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I support this motion as modified by Avri.  Can we assume 
>> that all of 
>>> us on this list support it?  Anyone opposed?
>>> 
>>> Chuck
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>>>> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:42 PM
>>>> To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended 
>>>> evaluation.
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I have accepted Chucks edits and added Tim's recommended change.
>>>> 
>>>> So does the mean we are done, at least for now, and that someone 
>>>> from the council will make/second the edited motion (attached)?
>>>> 
>>>> If not, please let me know what else needs to be fixed.
>>>> 
>>>> thanks
>>>> 
>>>> a.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 9.0.814 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2846 - Release Date: 
>>> 05/02/10
>> 02:27:00
>> 
>> 
>