RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended evaluation.

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think we are ready for a Councilor to make the motion.  Does anyone
disagree?  Edmon - are you going to make it?

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Kinderis [mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:58 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended
> evaluation.
> 
> I am ok with it.
> 
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Saturday, 1 May 2010 8:05 AM
> To: Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended
> evaluation.
> 
> 
> I support this motion as modified by Avri.  Can we assume that all of
> us
> on this list support it?  Anyone opposed?
> 
> Chuck
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:42 PM
> > To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on
> > extended evaluation.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have accepted Chucks edits and added Tim's recommended change.
> >
> > So does the mean we are done, at least for now, and that
> > someone from the council will make/second the edited motion
> > (attached)?
> >
> > If not, please let me know what else needs to be fixed.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > a.
> >
> >