<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended evaluation.
- To: <gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended evaluation.
- From: "Edmon Chung" <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 19:48:06 +0800
Am happy to send it into the council and make the motion. I believe we have
consensus to proceed.
Perhaps if we do not hear any objections by tomorrow, will send it in?
(Chuck, that is still ok with time?)
Edmon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf
> Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 7:13 PM
> To: Adrian Kinderis; Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended
evaluation.
> Importance: High
>
>
> I think we are ready for a Councilor to make the motion. Does anyone
> disagree? Edmon - are you going to make it?
>
> Chuck
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Adrian Kinderis [mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2010 9:58 PM
> > To: Gomes, Chuck; Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended
> > evaluation.
> >
> > I am ok with it.
> >
> > Adrian Kinderis
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On
> > Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> > Sent: Saturday, 1 May 2010 8:05 AM
> > To: Avri Doria; gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on extended
> > evaluation.
> >
> >
> > I support this motion as modified by Avri. Can we assume that all of
> > us
> > on this list support it? Anyone opposed?
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > > Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 12:42 PM
> > > To: gnso-idng@xxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [gnso-idng] Proposed motion for letter on
> > > extended evaluation.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have accepted Chucks edits and added Tim's recommended change.
> > >
> > > So does the mean we are done, at least for now, and that
> > > someone from the council will make/second the edited motion
> > > (attached)?
> > >
> > > If not, please let me know what else needs to be fixed.
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > a.
> > >
> > >
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.819 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2860 - Release Date: 05/10/10
02:26:00
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
|