Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] viability of the charter for this group

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

I find the wording of the resolutions "curious".

For the one on IGOs, the last whereas and the first resolved imply 
that the reservation would/could be lifted should the PDP decide that 
is the correct course (presuming the PDP is not overruled by a Board 
supermajority). But the second resolved does not explicitly say the 
reservation will be potentially temporary.
On the RCRC/IOC, the acknowledgement of the failed vote and 
re-submission and the wording in the resolved "until such time as a 
policy is adopted" (note not a PDP, just "policy") implies that this 
block can be altered by the upcoming GNSO motion.
Alan

At 28/11/2012 11:59 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Now that the Board has trumped the actions of this group with a 
> resolution (2012.11.26.NG03) that I consider, at best, premature and 
> at worst a slap in the face to all who work on PDPs, I wonder, how 
> does this affect our charter and work program?  The reason I beleive 
> this is such a slap as it took a different approach with regard to 
> IOC/RC that it did with IGOs (2012.11.26.NG01,2)
> For example, can we still recommend that one or both of those who 
> have been elevated beyond all others and have been granted special 
> protections, can have those protections removed by consensus of this PDP?
> avri