AW: [gnso-igo-ingo] viability of the charter for this group

["Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" <wolfgang.kleinwaechter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Avri
 
what is your proposal? Continue? Ignore? Rethink? Boycott?
 
The weak point is that we do not have established procedures for the 
interaction between the Board and the GNSO/GNSO Council. Whatever GNSO is doing 
the Board is free to accept it or to reject it. Should the Board be obliged to 
explain to the public when it ignores a "GNSO advice"? 
 
wolfgang   

________________________________

Von: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx im Auftrag von Avri Doria
Gesendet: Do 29.11.2012 05:59
An: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [gnso-igo-ingo] viability of the charter for this group




Hi,

Now that the Board has trumped the actions of this group with a resolution 
(2012.11.26.NG03) that I consider, at best, premature and at worst a slap in 
the face to all who work on PDPs, I wonder, how does this affect our charter 
and work program?  The reason I beleive this is such a slap as it took a 
different approach with regard to IOC/RC that it did with IGOs 
(2012.11.26.NG01,2)

For example, can we still recommend that one or both of those who have been 
elevated beyond all others and have been granted special protections, can have 
those protections removed by consensus of this PDP?

avri