<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] RCRC Comments on the WG IGO/INGO template
- To: "'Shatan, Gregory S.'" <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'David W. Maher'" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>, Stephane Hankins <shankins@xxxxxxxx>, THOMAS RICKERT <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] RCRC Comments on the WG IGO/INGO template
- From: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 14:29:37 -0200
The problem with legal considerations is that they differ from country to
country. Which laws should we take into account? There are some international
treaties on some IGO, but no on the protection of their names or brand, most
referred to their employees and their rights, and most surely they don't cover
all IGO and no INGO. At least that is what I've seen, I might be wrong since
I'm not a lawyer.
Also the legal considerations are restricted to the country that issued them,
and we are considering to impose them on all the new gTLD (I still think it
should be impose on all gTLD and ccTLD) independently of the country they are
established.
Best regards,
Osvaldo
-----Mensaje original-----
De: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] En
nombre de Shatan, Gregory S.
Enviado el: Miércoles, 05 de Diciembre de 2012 14:15
Para: 'David W. Maher'; Stephane Hankins; THOMAS RICKERT;
gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
CC: christopher.rassi@xxxxxxxx
Asunto: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] RCRC Comments on the WG IGO/INGO template
I disagree with both these points. First, our decisions should be based on
legal considerations. Even if humanitarian concerns are relevant, I don't
think this group or ICANN in general is qualified to evaluate the missions of
various IGOs/INGOs and decide which ones are "humanitarian." Nor should we
decide that "humanitarian" organizations should get greater protections. Is
the ASPCA not sufficiently "humanitarian" because it protects animals and not
humans?
Second, unless ICANN's procedures for the registration of domain names are
above the law, ICANN's procedures exist with and must be consistent with these
laws. And of course, we are talking about more than mere "procedure" here.
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of David W. Maher
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 8:55 PM
To: Stephane Hankins; THOMAS RICKERT; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx;
gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: christopher.rassi@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] RCRC Comments on the WG IGO/INGO template
I reiterate my position that the special protection of the Red Cross and Red
Crescent, if any, should be based on policy issues related to humanitarian
considerations, and not based on legal considerations. The laws referred to
below do not have anything to do with ICANN's procedures for the registration
of domain names.
David W. Maher
Senior Vice President - Law & Policy
Public Interest Registry
312 375 4849
From: Stephane Hankins <shankins@xxxxxxxx<mailto:shankins@xxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:54:05 -0500
To: THOMAS RICKERT <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>>,
"gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>>,
"gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: "christopher.rassi@xxxxxxxx<mailto:christopher.rassi@xxxxxxxx>"
<christopher.rassi@xxxxxxxx<mailto:christopher.rassi@xxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] RCRC Comments on the WG IGO/INGO template
Dear Thomas, dear Berry, dear all,
(1) Further to yesterday's call, please find attached, the "Red Cross and Red
Crescent" comments on the WG IGO/INGO Template distributed yesterday in track
changes. As indicated during the call, we recommend that the wording
"international organisations" be maintained throughout the document, as it will
better allow to encompassall concerned organisations, thus including the
international components of the the International Red Cross and Red Crescent
Movement which are considered to enjoy a distinct status under international
law. The latter stems in particular from the ICRC's enjoyment of international
mandates conferred upon it by the treaties of International Humanitarian Law,
the observer status recognized to the International Committee of the Red Cross
and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies in the
UN GA, the participation of the components of the Movement in the International
Conferences of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, in which State!
s participate, the Headquarters Agreements concluded by the ICRC and the
International Federation with many States and acknowledging inter alia the
Organisations' diplomatic priviliges and immunities.
It should also to our mind be made clear in the template that the WG will
require to examine and to take into due account also all distinctive grounds
substantiating the requirements for the protection and reservation of the
designations of the IO's under consideration and which would complement the
affiliation of the said names to any given organisation. This should allow to
fully and comprehensively reflect the global public interest in their
protection. As recalled during yesterday's call, the words "Red Cross" and "Red
Crescent" designations require to be protected, as stipulated under
international law treaties, in their own right as the designations of the
protective emblems of armed forces medical personnel in times of armed conflict
(and not only, or exclusively, as part of the names of the respective
components of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, whether
those of the International Committee of the Red Cross, International Federation
of Red Cros!
s and Red Crescent Societies, Afghan Red Crescent or American Red Cross).
(2) As a second point, we also wish to take this opportunity to emphasize, and
thus following certain argumentspresented during the yesterday's call, that the
protection of the Red Cross, Red Crescent and Red Crystal and related
designations is not being grounded or called for out of "sympathy" for the Red
Cross and Red Crescent or for its humanitarian roles, but because the
protection of these names stems and is a requirement under universally agreed
international norms of international humanitarian law (194, soon to be 195
States partiesto the 1949 Geneva Conventions).
(3) We take this opportunity to attach the Position Paper which we submitted to
the Board on 13 June 2012. There are also, as participants in the former
Drafting Group on IOC/RC will recall, a series of other past submissions of the
RCRC shared since the beginning of this year.
With best regards,
Stéphane J. Hankins
Legal adviser
Cooperation and coordination within the Movement International Committee of the
Red Cross Tel (direct line): ++0041 22 730 24 19
Christopher M. Rassi
Senior Legal Officer
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Chemin des
Crêts, 17|1209 Petit Saconnex |Geneva|Switzerland Tel. +41 (0)22 730 4536 | Fax
+41 (0)22 733 0395
===============================================================================
The ICRC - working to protect and assist people affected by armed conflict and
other situations of violence. Find out more: www.icrc.org This e-mail is
intended for the named recipient(s) only. Its contents are confidential and may
only be retained by the named recipient (s) and may only be copied or disclosed
with the consent of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). If you
are not an intended recipient please delete this e-mail and notify the sender.
===============================================================================
El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente
al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial.
Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente
respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los
posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier
utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad
que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna
responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida
incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información
This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the
addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender
immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files.
Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not
the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any
communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|