ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-igo-ingo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] food for thought - options to be considered

  • To: "'Avri Doria'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] food for thought - options to be considered
  • From: "Shatan, Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 20:26:34 +0000

I tend to agree with Avri.  At the least, it should certainly be in the mix (I 
think it is, but we have tended to assume the most "radical" result is the one 
we are considering....).

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:23 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] food for thought - options to be considered


Hi,

I think this, a TMCH-like mechanism,  is well worth exploring.  It allows for 
prior action without the kinds of prior restraint on expression problems that 
reserved name lists have.

avri

On 23 Jan 2013, at 15:05, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> Ricardo,
>
> I find your conclusion, which I copy here for clarity helpful:
>
> “What could this look like? Here is a very rough sketch:
>
> - Organizations can have their designations added to a database (such as the 
> TMCH database). Identical match strings will be added after validation.
> - Whenever a registration for an identical match is attempted, eligibility of 
> the registrant will be checked before the domain name is registered. 
> Eligibility is given either if an organization holding that designation is 
> carrying out the registration or if the registrant is registering the domain 
> name legitimately according to the exemption rules, i.e. where use is 
> permitted).
> - Registrations for eligible registrants will be carried out on a first come 
> first served basis.
>
> Such approach would prevent unauthorized registrations from taking place. At 
> the same time (since registrations are fcfs) there is a level playing field 
> and eligible parties would not necessarily prevail over other legitimate 
> registrants.
>
> One could even apply such method for the top level (taking into account the 
> question of the applicability of the string similarity review) .”
>
> Chuck
>




                                                                * * *

This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered
confidential and may well be legally privileged. If you have received it in
error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply
e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or
use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other
person. Thank you for your cooperation.

                                                                * * *

To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we
inform you that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax
advice contained in this communication  (including any attachments) is not
intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state
and local provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
                                                                        
Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy