Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] food for thought - options to be considered

[Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Just to avoid confusion: The quote in Chuck's e-mail is not from Ricardo, but 
taken from my e-mail.

Thomas


Am 23.01.2013 um 21:26 schrieb "Shatan, Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> 
> I tend to agree with Avri.  At the least, it should certainly be in the mix 
> (I think it is, but we have tended to assume the most "radical" result is the 
> one we are considering....).
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:23 PM
> To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] food for thought - options to be considered
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think this, a TMCH-like mechanism,  is well worth exploring.  It allows for 
> prior action without the kinds of prior restraint on expression problems that 
> reserved name lists have.
> 
> avri
> 
> On 23 Jan 2013, at 15:05, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
>> Ricardo,
>> 
>> I find your conclusion, which I copy here for clarity helpful:
>> 
>> “What could this look like? Here is a very rough sketch:
>> 
>> - Organizations can have their designations added to a database (such as the 
>> TMCH database). Identical match strings will be added after validation.
>> - Whenever a registration for an identical match is attempted, eligibility 
>> of the registrant will be checked before the domain name is registered. 
>> Eligibility is given either if an organization holding that designation is 
>> carrying out the registration or if the registrant is registering the domain 
>> name legitimately according to the exemption rules, i.e. where use is 
>> permitted).
>> - Registrations for eligible registrants will be carried out on a first come 
>> first served basis.
>> 
>> Such approach would prevent unauthorized registrations from taking place. At 
>> the same time (since registrations are fcfs) there is a level playing field 
>> and eligible parties would not necessarily prevail over other legitimate 
>> registrants.
>> 
>> One could even apply such method for the top level (taking into account the 
>> question of the applicability of the string similarity review) .”
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                                                * * *
> 
> This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered
> confidential and may well be legally privileged. If you have received it in
> error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply
> e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or
> use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other
> person. Thank you for your cooperation.
> 
>                                                                * * *
> 
> To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we
> inform you that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax
> advice contained in this communication  (including any attachments) is not
> intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1)
> avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state
> and local provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
> party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
>                                                                        
> Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00
>