RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] food for thought - options to be considered

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry about confusing the source.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-
> ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Rickert
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:29 PM
> To: Shatan, Gregory S.
> Cc: 'Avri Doria'; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] food for thought - options to be
> considered
> 
> 
> Just to avoid confusion: The quote in Chuck's e-mail is not from
> Ricardo, but taken from my e-mail.
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> Am 23.01.2013 um 21:26 schrieb "Shatan, Gregory S."
> <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> >
> > I tend to agree with Avri.  At the least, it should certainly be in
> the mix (I think it is, but we have tended to assume the most "radical"
> result is the one we are considering....).
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:23 PM
> > To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] food for thought - options to be
> > considered
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think this, a TMCH-like mechanism,  is well worth exploring.  It
> allows for prior action without the kinds of prior restraint on
> expression problems that reserved name lists have.
> >
> > avri
> >
> > On 23 Jan 2013, at 15:05, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> >
> >> Ricardo,
> >>
> >> I find your conclusion, which I copy here for clarity helpful:
> >>
> >> "What could this look like? Here is a very rough sketch:
> >>
> >> - Organizations can have their designations added to a database
> (such as the TMCH database). Identical match strings will be added
> after validation.
> >> - Whenever a registration for an identical match is attempted,
> eligibility of the registrant will be checked before the domain name is
> registered. Eligibility is given either if an organization holding that
> designation is carrying out the registration or if the registrant is
> registering the domain name legitimately according to the exemption
> rules, i.e. where use is permitted).
> >> - Registrations for eligible registrants will be carried out on a
> first come first served basis.
> >>
> >> Such approach would prevent unauthorized registrations from taking
> place. At the same time (since registrations are fcfs) there is a level
> playing field and eligible parties would not necessarily prevail over
> other legitimate registrants.
> >>
> >> One could even apply such method for the top level (taking into
> account the question of the applicability of the string similarity
> review) ."
> >>
> >> Chuck
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                                                                * * *
> >
> > This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential
> > and may well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error,
> > you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by
> reply
> > e-mail and then delete this message from your system. Please do not
> > copy it or use it for any purposes, or disclose its contents to any
> > other person. Thank you for your cooperation.
> >
> >                                                                * * *
> >
> > To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform
> > you that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax
> > advice contained in this communication  (including any attachments)
> is
> > not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the
> > purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or
> > applicable state and local provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or
> > recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed
> herein.
> >
> > Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00
> >
> 
>