RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO Organization Survey / Domain Registration Analysis

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Having just gone through an identical search for 
input on a different PDP, I can tell you that the 
input comments are cryptically hidden under "WG Documents (Drafts - Published".
From the link that Berry provided, if you click 
on or hover over the almost invisibly "..." in 
the white title on the light-blue background just 
above the Dashboard/AC/SO tabs, you will see the page hierarchy.
Alan

At 28/01/2013 05:36 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Thanks Berry.  I went to  this 
> link: 
> <https://community.icann.org/display/GWGTCT/IGO-INGO+Protections+Policy+Development+Process+%28PDP%29+Working+Group>https://community.icann.org/display/GWGTCT/IGO-INGO+Protections+Policy+Development+Process+%28PDP%29+Working+Group 
> When I went there I saw the following menu:
>
> <https://community.icann.org/display/GWGTCT/IGO-INGO+Protections+Policy+Development+Process+%28PDP%29+Working+Group>IGO-INGO 
> Protections Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group
> §  <https://community.icann.org/display/GWGTCT/1.+Meetings>1. Meetings
> § 
> <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=38044449>2. 
> WG Documents (Drafts - Published)
> §  <https://community.icann.org/display/GWGTCT/3.+WG+Charter>3. WG Charter
> §  <https://community.icann.org/display/GWGTCT/4.+Members>4. Members
> § 
> <https://community.icann.org/display/GWGTCT/5.+Background+Documents>5. 
> Background Documents
>
> As you can see there is no ‘SG&C / SO&AC 
> Responses to Input Request’ like I get at the link you provided.
>
>
>
>
> Any idea what I did wrong?
>
>
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
>
> From: Berry Cobb [mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 5:04 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Thomas Rickert'
> Cc: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO Organization 
> Survey / Domain Registration Analysis
> Hi Chuck,
>
> They can be found on the Wiki:
> <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40175441>https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=40175441 
>
> B
>
> Berry Cobb
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> 720.839.5735
> <mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> @berrycobb
>
>
> From: 
> <mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 14:43
> To: Thomas Rickert
> Cc: Berry Cobb; <mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO Organization 
> Survey / Domain Registration Analysis
> Are the SG statements to the WG posted somewhere 
> on the ICANN website or wiki?  If so, where?
> Chuck
>
> From: Thomas Rickert [<mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2013 10:46 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: Berry Cobb; <mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO Organization 
> Survey / Domain Registration Analysis
> Hello Chuck,
> that was the idea.
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 26.01.2013 um 22:24 schrieb "Gomes, Chuck" 
> <<mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Is the expectation that the organizations that 
> want protection would provide the data?
> Chuck
>
> From: 
> <mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 3:17 PM
> To: <mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO Organization Survey 
> / Domain Registration Analysis
> Team,
>
> Attached is a spreadsheet evolved from the 
> analysis started by Alan Greenberg and supported 
> by other in the WG that should be performed to 
> further define the nature of the problem.  At 
> this stage, we are looking for the WG to comment 
> on this approach before we continue “filling in 
> the blanks.”  If the WG agrees with this 
> approach, we can then discuss a divide and 
> conquer strategy to complete the analysis.
> A few notes about the SS:
>
> 1.          The 1st tab, “data_gather_form” is a 
> list of the items Alan suggested we request 
> information from organizations seeking 
> protection.  Other WG members seemed to agree 
> with this list of questions.  I’d like to ask 
> the WG to review and recommend additional types 
> of information that we should possibly 
> request.  A possible tool to solicit this 
> feedback from the organizations is to construct 
> a survey and distribute to organizations 
> identified for completion.  ICANN has deployed a 
> survey tool (LimeSurvey) that may benefit this 
> exercise 
> (<https://limesurvey.icann.org/>https://limesurvey.icann.org/), 
> and it may aid in generating useful statistics to aid in the analysis.
> 2.          The 2nd tab, 
> “registration_by_org_by_tld” is a matrix evolved 
> from the analysis performed by Alan, and it also 
> includes responses submitted by the IOC.  Several notes about this framework:
> a.          The organizations listed here are 
> the organizations list in the 13DEC11 letter to 
> ICANN signed by NGOs.  It also includes UNICEF 
> (from Alan’s PDF analysis) that was not a signatory of the letter.
> b.          Not all identifiers from the IOC and 
> RCRC are included at this point.  We can add 
> them to this analysis after we agree to the approach.
> c.          I only completed the IOC identifiers 
> as a working example.  As you will see we have 
> much more to complete once finalized.
> d.          Countrycodes listed next to the TLDs 
> are not all inclusive, but I attempted to pick 
> the larger ccTLDs.  We can add others as necessary.
> e.          The remainder of TLD types are 
> divided by generic, generic-restricted, and 
> sponsored as defined by IANA Root Zone dB
> f.           Cells with Green Fill and White 
> letters are an indication that the site may have 
> legitimate use, as first identified by Alan
> g.          We may want to further define 
> meta-tags for domains that are registered, but 
> not controlled by the respective organization 
> (i.e. do we tag by malicious use, monetary gain, for sale, etc….)
> h.          Stats at the bottom of the chart for 
> each organization are meant to:
> ·            Determine total % of identifier 
> domains as registered across the various TLDs
> ·            Then a % of domains registered as a breakout of TLD type
> ·            Each is compared alongside as to 
> whether the respective org has control of the domain or not
> We welcome your input to this tool.  Please 
> provide feedback over the list, and we will 
> discuss this approach at our meeting next week.
> Thank you.  B
>
> Berry Cobb
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> 720.839.5735
> <mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> @berrycobb