<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-igo-ingo] RE: opening of RPMs
- To: "David W. Maher" <dmaher@xxxxxxx>, Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] RE: opening of RPMs
- From: "Claudia MACMASTER TAMARIT" <MACMASTER@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:19:03 +0000
Hi,
I volunteer as well if I can be of assistance.
Best,
Claudia
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of David W. Maher
Sent: 2013-02-15 00:00
To: Thomas Rickert
Cc: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Re: opening of RPMs
Thomas:
I am willing to take the lead on a policy recommendation with reference to the
RPMs.
David
David W. Maher
Senior Vice President Law & Policy
Public Interest Registry
312 375 4849
On 2/14/13 12:10 PM, "Thomas Rickert" <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Hello David,
>I hope this e-mail finds you well. We have discussed the question of
>protection mechanisms during yesterdays call and I tested (again)
>whether there was any opposition to opening up the RPMs so that all
>potential beneficiaries of the PDP can use them.
>
>In my view, the work on this question would be best placed in the
>sub-group you are leading.
>
>We should come up with a policy recommendation (that could be part of a
>bigger set of recommendations) for this question.
>
>Is that something that you would be willing to lead on?
>
>Please note that, although no member of the working group seems to be
>against this idea of opening the RPMs, I would like to point out that
>even if we work on policy recommendations in this regard, these would
>not be looked at in isolation.
>
>As mentioned many times before, the group should develop a package of
>potential recommendations (unless the group decides to split the
>recommendations) and then these would be put out for a consensus call.
>
>Thanks,
>Thomas
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|