<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-igo-ingo] MP3 IGO-INGO Protections Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group - 27 February 2013
- To: "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] MP3 IGO-INGO Protections Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group - 27 February 2013
- From: Julia Charvolen <julia.charvolen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:28:03 -0800
Dear All,
The next call for the IGO-INGO Protections Policy Development Process (PDP)
Working Group is scheduled on Wednesday 6 March at 17:00 UTC.
Please find the MP3 recording of the IGO-INGO Protections Policy Development
Process (PDP) Working Group teleconference held on Wednesday 27 February 2013
at 19:00 UTC at:
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-igo-ingo-20130227-en.mp3
On page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#feb
The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master
Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/
Attendees:
Jim Bikoff – IPC/IOC
Elizabeth Finberg - RySG
Chuck Gomes - RySG
Alan Greenberg - ALAC
Catherine Gribbin - Red Cross
David Heasley - IPC/IOC
David Maher - RySG
Kiran Malancharuvil - IPC/IOC
Thomas Rickert - NCA - Working group chair
Greg Shatan - IPC
Claudia MacMaster Tamarit - ISO
Mary Wong - NCUC
Jonathan Robinson - RySG - GNSO Council Chair
Mason Cole - GNSO Council vice chair
Apologies:
Wilson Abigagba - NCSG
Avri Doria – NCSG
Evan Leibovitch – ALAC
Lanre Ajayi - NCA
Paul Diaz – RySG
Guilaine Fournet – (IEC)
David Roache-Turner - WIPO
Ricardo Guilherme – RySG
Christopher Rassi - Red Cross
Iliya Bazlyankov – RrSG
ICANN Staff:
Berry Cobb
Brian Peck
Julia Charvolen
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Julia Charvolen
For GNSO Secretariat
*************
Adobe Chat transcript for 27 February 2013:
Berry Cobb:Welcome to the 27 FEB 2013 IGO-INGO Teleconference.
Thomas Rickert:Waiting for the operator....
Kiran/Jim (IOC):Hi all, Kiran Malancharuvil, Jim Bikoff and David Heasley
here from the IOC.
Julia Charvolen:Thank you, will note that
Kiran/Jim (IOC):Thanks Julia!
Julia Charvolen:Elizabeth Finberg joined the phone bridge
Julia Charvolen:Mary Wong and Greg Shatan joined
Elizabeth Finberg:Thanks, Julia
Elizabeth Finberg:+1 Chuck
Alan Greenberg:WOlfgang, I think, was the first one to raise the ECOSOC
list...
Claudia MacMaster Tamarit (ISO):I'm sure you're right, Alan. It was already
in discussion even in the Report, if memory serves.
Claudia MacMaster Tamarit (ISO):Mary+1
Alan Greenberg:It is a 3 dinetional problem, type of org, criteria, type of
protection.
Alan Greenberg:We do have a LOT of people missing today.
Kiran/Jim (IOC):I'm not sure what Alan is really saying, can't agree or
disagree without additional explanation. Can you clarify Alan?
Claudia MacMaster Tamarit (ISO):Chuck, why should the "why" be different for
different groups (unless of course the law requires it absolutely)?
Claudia MacMaster Tamarit (ISO):It does for me, thanks.
Kiran/Jim (IOC):Thanks Alan, very helpful
Mason Cole:All -- have to drop off call now. I will catch up.
Kiran/Jim (IOC):It's the UN6 plus 3 additional languages (German, Greek and
Korean)
Kiran/Jim (IOC):just a minor point of clarification, thanks
Berry Cobb:Thank you Kiran. Updated
Claudia MacMaster Tamarit (ISO):I hope
Claudia MacMaster Tamarit (ISO):I always gets bumped off the line at the good
part.
Julia Charvolen:Do you want operator to dial out to you?
Claudia MacMaster Tamarit (ISO):back finally. thanks Julia.
Julia Charvolen:sure you're welcome
Berry
Cobb:http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-26feb13-en.htm
Alan Greenberg:The discssion between Chuck and me DOES demonstrate how
difficult some of these issues are.
Greg Shatan:Per Module 4: The outcome of the String Similarity review
described in Module 2 is the identification of contention sets among
applications that have direct or indirect contention relationships with one
another. Page 4.3.
Claudia MacMaster Tamarit (ISO):I'm afraid I have to leave early. Thank you
Thomas and all colleagues in advance. Apologies for my departure.
Chuck Gomes:@ Greg: See AG 2.2.1.1.1 There are four types sting similarity
reviews and only one of them results in contention sets.
Alan Greenberg:One commen on permanent claims notices. Registrars have said
that many of them, and particularly those who work thtrough resellers, bout not
support a permanent claim notice without very significant cost and difficullty.
I'm not makeing that claim, just alerting the group to them.
Chuck Gomes:I do not recall
Chuck Gomes:Not shy just very busy!
Alan Greenberg:Ig you do a Google search for "UDRP IGO site:icann.org", you
will see the draft IGO domain name dispute. But the link no longer works. Will
try to find the new link.
Chuck Gomes:Thanks Thomas
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|