<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] [] RySG Recommendations
- To: "GNSO IGO INGO (gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx)" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] [] RySG Recommendations
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 10:58:26 -0500
On 23 Apr 2013, at 10:52, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>>>
>>> b. Require applicable IGOs to apply for protection of their full names
>>> at the
>> top and/or second levels prior to finalizing the list of qualifying
>> organizations
>> that would receive protection
>>
>> Against what standards would these applications be made? If we are going to
>> allow people to apply for special protection for their names we have to take
>> the
>> widest possible approach to this and allow every NGO and charitable
>> institution
>> the same privileges.
> [Gomes, Chuck] They would simply have to be on the GAC list. The idea here
> is not to evaluate applications against specific standards but rather to only
> give protection to those listed organizations that actually want to have the
> protections and therefore not taking names out of commission if there is
> really not a desire for protection. This would be a very simple process
> whereby an organization on the list would just request the protection offered
> by the policy.
>
>
So any organization that wanted the protection priviledge would need to
petition the GAC to be put on the list?
Kind of like petitioning ISO to get on the ISO list to get a ccTLD?
thanks
avri
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|