RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] [] RySG Recommendations

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yes Avri.  If an organization was already on the list, it would simply need to 
communicate that it desired the offered protection.  If an organization was not 
on the list, it would need to petition the GAC to be added to the list.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 11:58 AM
> To: GNSO IGO INGO (gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx)
> Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] [] RySG Recommendations
> 
> 
> 
> On 23 Apr 2013, at 10:52, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> 
> >>>
> >>> b.     Require applicable IGOs to apply for protection of their full 
> >>> names at
> the
> >> top and/or second levels prior to finalizing the list of qualifying
> >> organizations that would receive protection
> >>
> >> Against what standards would these applications be made?   If we are going
> to
> >> allow people to apply for special protection for their names we have
> >> to take the widest possible approach to this and allow every NGO and
> >> charitable institution the same privileges.
> > [Gomes, Chuck]  They would simply have to be on the GAC list.  The idea here
> is not to evaluate applications against specific standards but rather to only 
> give
> protection to those listed organizations that actually want to have the
> protections and therefore not taking names out of commission if there is 
> really
> not a desire for protection.  This would be a very simple process whereby an
> organization on the list would just request the protection offered by the 
> policy.
> >
> >
> 
> 
> So any organization that wanted the protection priviledge would need to
> petition the GAC to be put on the list?
> Kind of like petitioning ISO to get on the ISO list to get a ccTLD?
> 
> thanks
> 
> avri