RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Fee waiver / reduction?

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Doing that would then would require that we agree on criteria for who would be 
eligible for fee waivers and that would put us into another process that would 
be fairly subjective and possible require a mechanism for applying the criteria.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 5:14 PM
> To: GNSO IGO INGO (gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx)
> Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Fee waiver / reduction?
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> personal view
> 
> while I am loathe to agree to any a-priori special reservation privileges for
> anyone,
> 
> I am supportive of fee wavers for everything so that the existing RPMs can be
> used by qualifying charities and fellow public service organizations  without
> further expense.
> 
> avri
> 
> On 25 Apr 2013, at 14:13, Thomas Rickert wrote:
> 
> >
> > All,
> > thanks again for a constructive discussion yesterday. I would like to obtain
> some feedback from you regarding the question of a fee waiver for the
> beneficiaries of protections.
> >
> > Fee waivers (and standing) could be considered for:
> >
> > - Objections against applications for gTLDs / Top Level
> > - Applications to the TMCH
> > - URS
> > - UDRP
> >
> > As you know, we have structured our discussion yesterday along the proposed
> recommendations by the RySG. A fee waiver was not part of that set of
> recommendations and I would like to better understand whether the WG
> members wish / do not wish such recommendation to be added.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Thomas
> >
> > =============
> > thomas-rickert.tel
> > +49.228.74.898.0
> >
> >
>