Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Fee waiver / reduction?

[Mason Cole <mcole@xxxxxxxxxx>]

At this stage, I don't find a compelling reason for fee waivers.

On Apr 25, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Thomas Rickert wrote:

> 
> All,
> thanks again for a constructive discussion yesterday. I would like to obtain 
> some feedback from you regarding the question of a fee waiver for the 
> beneficiaries of protections.
> 
> Fee waivers (and standing) could be considered for:
> 
> - Objections against applications for gTLDs / Top Level
> - Applications to the TMCH
> - URS
> - UDRP
> 
> As you know, we have structured our discussion yesterday along the proposed 
> recommendations by the RySG. A fee waiver was not part of that set of 
> recommendations and I would like to better understand whether the WG members 
> wish / do not wish such recommendation to be added.
> 
> Thanks,
> Thomas
> 
> =============
> thomas-rickert.tel
> +49.228.74.898.0
> 
>