ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-igo-ingo]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO

  • To: "'Berry Cobb'" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO
  • From: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 11:31:55 -0300

Sorry for the delay, but we had to reach consensus in the ISPCP.
Best regards,
Osvaldo

________________________________
De: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] En 
nombre de Berry Cobb
Enviado el: Viernes, 10 de Mayo de 2013 23:58
Para: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Asunto: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO

Hi everyone,

Please see the note from our Chair about what we hope to accomplish for next 
week.  Also when completing the attached form, we ask if could state whether 
the response submitted is in your personal view or the view of the group you 
most represent.  I will consolidate responses into one source as you send them 
next week.  Thank you.  B


Thomas' note:

All,
As discussed during last week's call, we need to determine soon whether we 
proceed working on recommendations prior to publishing the report or whether we 
should publish the report in order to be able to incorporate community feedback 
into our thinking prior to a consensus call. The required minimum comment 
period is 42 days from posting with 21 of those days being the reply period.

In the attached overview, you find my current assessment of where we are in 
terms of consensus or the absence thereof.

Please note that we have phrased the recommendations in a way that appeared to 
find most support. In our discussions, we have also talked about higher 
protection levels, but the support level for these was lower.

What you should do:

1. Please go through the spreadsheet and check whether you agree with the 
assessment of the current consensus level. If you think my assessment is wrong, 
please let me know. Also, if you think my assessment needs updating because you 
have changed the view you have previously represented, please also let me know.

2. If you think you cannot or do not wish to support the recommendations in the 
spreadsheet, but modifications thereof, please let us know and make a concrete 
proposal for a wording. In order to avoid repetition: Please DO NOT repeat 
positions you have already taken and which did not get traction with the group. 
To give you an example: If you think you cannot support the Trademark Claims 
Service as stated, but you would be able to support it if it was offered for 
more than 90 days, you should say exactly what change you need to support it.

3. As far as INGOs are concerned, the current assessment is "divergence". I 
have noted that the proposal made by Claudia was welcomed by some in the group. 
However, I have not heard anyone else saying that they would support the 
recommendation on an "as is" basis. Therefore, please DO confirm if you support 
the recommendations or let us know what changes would need to be made so you 
can support them. Also, if you have a different proposal, please share it. 
Should we not get such feedback on the list, my assessment would not change.

You do not have to answer all questions; we would - however - take your silence 
as a signal of no opposition.

As time is of essence, we need your feedback by the end of next Tuesday. 
Depending on the feedback we get, we will either confirm or cancel next 
Wednesday's call.

Thanks and kind regards,
Thomas





Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
@berrycobb



________________________________
El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto est? dirigido ?nicamente 
al destinatario del mensaje y contiene informaci?n que puede ser confidencial. 
Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente 
respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los 
posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Est? prohibida cualquier 
utilizaci?n, difusi?n o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad 
que no sean las espec?ficas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna 
responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicaci?n que haya sido emitida 
incumpliendo nuestra Pol?tica de Seguridad de la Informaci?n


This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the 
addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender 
immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. 
Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not 
the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any 
communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.

Attachment: IGO-INGO_Protection_ Matrix_ISPCP.xlsx
Description: IGO-INGO_Protection_ Matrix_ISPCP.xlsx



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy