RE: [gnso-igo-ingo] Draft Initial Report for IGO/INGO PDP WG

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Whereas I do not necessarily think we need to discuss most of the edits 
proposed by others unless any members express concerns about them or in cases 
of conflicting views, I do think we need to discuss several of the concerns 
expressed by Alan in our call today.

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Alan Greenberg
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 1:10 AM
To: Brian Peck; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Erika Randall; Marika Konings
Subject: Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] Draft Initial Report for IGO/INGO PDP WG

Attached please find my commented version of the draft report. Although many of 
these comments are in line with previous ALAC statements, these comments are 
being submitted solely on my own behalf.

Alan

At 22/05/2013 02:01 PM, Brian Peck wrote:

To the Working Group Members,

Please find attached the draft version of the IGO-INGO Initial Report for your 
review.

In line with the discussions led by Thomas on our last call, the primary 
objective of this Report is to highlight to the community the policy 
recommendation options which the WG has considered in order to solicit direct 
feedback and/or indications of support for specific options.  After receiving 
community input the plan would be to hold a consensus call for the proposed 
policy recommendations on special protections.

As a result, the focus of the Report is Section 4, with less emphasis on 
history, background, process/next steps. The Report notes to the community that 
the proposed recommendation options do not represent a consensus position and 
thus, we attempted to not include stakeholder positions on any of the possible 
recommendations or any consensus level indications as observed by the Chair or 
WG.  We have suggested some specific questions to the community to solicit 
feedback which are included in the Objectives Section.

We would greatly appreciate your review and submission of comments/edits you 
may have in a timely manner so that we can publish the Report for public 
comment by 30 May, which will give us enough time with the Reply Period to meet 
the submission deadline for Durban.  In making edits/comments to this Report, 
we would ask that any positions or comments on the proposed recommendations be 
made through the public comment period rather than through this Report.

 Input Deadline:  29 May 12:00 UTC
 Next Meeting:  29 May 2013, 16:00 UTC

 We will review the report and discuss proposed edits and changes at our next 
meeting on the 29th.  It is important to have your suggestions submitted by the 
deadline as to allow merging with the master copy of the report.

****NOTE****

When providing feedback, please save a copy of this MS Word document with a 
change of the file name to indicate who you are or represent.  Track changes 
are turned on.  Please submit all comments you have about the report within the 
Word document.  We would like to ensure we collate all feedback in one location.

Thank you in advance for your continued support and contributions to this WG.

Best Regards,

Brian

Brian Peck
Policy Director
ICANN